The core problem with BTC
By: bitcoin ethereum news|2025/05/02 21:30:01
0
Share
Homepage > News > Editorial > The core problem with BTC For many years now, I have written that BTC has become “a soft money” and attempted to warn a community I once believed in that the path of convenience, politics, and social consensus was leading them into the arms of the very systems they claimed to oppose—one where an oligarchical intelligentsia rules a new world technocracy that is more oppressive than the last. Now, in the spring of 2025, that warning is bearing (more) bitter fruit for the small blockers. A new proposal from Bitcoin Core developers seek to remove longstanding limits on the OP_RETURN function, a change that speaks volumes about the true nature of BTC in its current form and culture. And it’s not good. They say BTC doesn’t change. Right now, they’re all fighting about who gets to change it – again. — Kurt Wuckert Jr (@kurtwuckertjr) April 30, 2025 The proposal in question, advanced by Peter Todd, would eliminate the 80-byte cap on OP_RETURN output scripts in BTC. That limit was originally imposed, if you believe the rhetoric, as a safeguard to prevent abuse, to encourage monetary uses of the protocol, and to keep node storage burdens modest. In reality, it was pushed almost exclusively by Luke Dashjr to kill off Satoshi Dice, CounterParty tokens and everyone else in 2015 who was doing cool stuff with Bitcoin. “all “standardness” rules are conceptually problematic to the very core” Almost all the standardness rules are either avoiding actual DoS attacks like excessive checksigs, or leaving room for soft fork upgrades. The DoS attacks should be fixed of course – hopefully the Great... — Peter Todd (@peterktodd) April 29, 2025 Proponents of the new change now argue that these constraints are arbitrary, outdated, or easily circumvented and that removing them merely reflects reality. But reality, as always with BTC, is contested terrain, and it’s increasingly clear that reality is whatever the High Priests of Bitcoin Core decree—which is a problem because about 99% of the BTC network is running the “Core” reference client software—a dangerous level of centralization. Bitcoin Core is completely captured. If you’re still running it (~99% of nodes are), then there’s no other way to say it – you are facilitating an ongoing attack on Bitcoin. Your use of the software is giving the attackers the power to carry out their attack. Remove that power. — Bitcoin Lebowski (@DudeJLebowski) April 29, 2025 Let’s pause to consider the architecture here. In the BTC Core world, policy changes begin life as GitHub pull requests, vetted by a small cohort of developers and eventually merged into the reference implementation. If you raise concerns—as one contributor recently did, eloquently and at length—you are told to “vote with your feet” or your hash. Or worse, you are ratioed, flagged, silenced, or dismissed. This is not decentralization. It is a bureaucracy with a command line and a direct repudiation of what Bitcoin was supposed to be. And that’s half the problem, since bad actors have taken over Bitcoin Core maintainership. — Luke Dashjr (@LukeDashjr) May 1, 2025 The original vision, as Satoshi outlined and as BSV continues to uphold, is a system governed not by invisible developer councils or sacred repositories, but by the free market itself. In BSV, consensus rules are generalized and then locked such that most things are policy rules to be configured by competing node operators. Those node operators choose the rules they enforce, and users choose to connect to the nodes they trust. The balance of power is spread across competing commercial interests, not consolidated behind a single GitHub repo guarded like the Holy of Holies. Lopp was literally rubbing it in our faces that he fully intends to rape us. This isn’t just some disagreement: they are literally committing violence against Bitcoiners. — Luke Dashjr (@LukeDashjr) April 30, 2025 This is the core philosophical difference: BTC is governed by a strict hierarchical committee. BSV is governed by competing market incentives of commercial operators. And it matters. When policy becomes protocol and protocol becomes ideology, Bitcoin ceases to be money and becomes a meme. This is what I mean when I say that BTC is a soft money: it is not backed by consistent rules, or by the discipline of the market. It is steered by people, subject to politics, and vulnerable to moral panics and backroom bargains. It is, in the end, a fiat money in open-source clothing that never actually becomes serious for anything except the meme itself. This is the tragedy of the Bitcoin Civil War, and it is what I’ve spent years trying to explain. Bitcoin didn’t split because of a block size dispute. It split because one side believed in the sovereignty of protocol, and the other believed in the supremacy of social consensus. One side wanted money governed by honest actors, constrained by economic incentives, and flexible as a general-purpose money, payment system and distributed database. The other wanted money that could be tinkered with endlessly by those who claimed to “understand it best” and ultimately beholden to social signalling and constant jockeying of a bizarre mix of political forces. Knots runners are censoring financial related transactions. My node therefore rejects all connections to Knots. Fuck Knots and anyone that uses it. https://t.co/rhhtfFFHYs — noosphere888 #FREESAMOURAI (@noosphere888x2) April 30, 2025 We now know where that road leads: to policy changes locked behind pull request comment freezes. To governance by insiders. To a transactional system where few actually transact. And now to a redefinition of OP_RETURN; not because of demand, not because of competition, not because of any urgent need in the market, but because a small cabal of developers decided the rule was inconvenient for their own commercial needs, and therefore, deemed into the protocol. If that doesn’t make you pause, it should. Because what happens when it’s not OP_RETURN? What happens when they decide that your privacy is too subversive, or that your scaling solution is too unorthodox, or that your coins—mined honestly, used legally—are somehow suspect because they don’t align with the evolving orthodoxy of BTC Core? Or, imagine this: what happens when Peter Todd, the architect of this latest controversy, decides it’s finally time to raise the supply cap of BTC? Can you stop him, anon? This is Peter Todd. He thinks Satoshi Nakamoto did a bad job engineering bitcoin, so when HBO doxed him, Greg Maxwell (disgraced Wikimedia mod) didn’t write a long takedown piece just hours later. Because Peter helped destroy BTC’s usefulness as cash with his RBF work, Adam... pic.twitter.com/3wDJuuglkL — Kurt Wuckert Jr (@kurtwuckertjr) October 9, 2024 The answer is simple: you get forked off the network. Or you get banned. Or you get ignored until your network dies. In BSV, we have chosen another path. Our network is open. Our rules are stable and predictable. Our governance is minimal and easy to understand. We welcome competition between node clients, service providers, miners, merchants, wallets, and users. And while we are not perfect, we are principled—and that’s the part that matters. The way forward is not to consolidate power further. It is to disperse it. It is to allow policy settings to compete. To let wallets and exchanges and miners decide, on the open market, what rules make sense for their own businesses. That is the path to scaling. That is the path to adoption. And that is the only path to money that is truly sound. A sound money must be hard in every sense: hard to change, hard to censor, and hard to kill. BTC has failed that test. Again. But Bitcoin, the real Bitcoin, the protocol etched into the white paper and revived in BSV, has never failed that test. Watch: Mining Disrupt 2025 Highlights: Profitable trends every miner should know title=”YouTube video player” frameborder=”0′′ allow=”accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share” referrerpolicy=”strict-origin-when-cross-origin” allowfullscreen> Source: https://coingeek.com/the-core-problem-with-btc/
You may also like

Revisiting RWA: Nearly 50,000 people's first on-chain transaction was not Bitcoin, but stock indices and crude oil
The narrative of RWA is not about traditional finance trying to capture crypto users, but rather crypto trying to capture traditional users.

Altcoin Price Outlook 2026: The Rotation Is Coming — Just Not the Way You Think
Bitcoin dominance at 58%, Fear & Greed at 39. If you think altcoin season is dead, you're reading the wrong signals. Here's what the data actually says about what comes next.

Oracle: The Second Battlefield Behind the Prediction Market War
By 2026, the oracle track has essentially evolved from the early "data pipeline" into a "verifiable facts layer" that supports the entire on-chain economy, and prediction markets serve as a magnifying glass to observe the competition in this red ocean.

a16z's key bet: Kalshi's weekly trading volume approaches $3 billion, transitioning from "prediction games" to financial infrastructure, the market begins to price "uncertainty."
The evolution of prediction markets: from niche products to "uncertainty pricing" infrastructure

Morning Report | Galaxy Digital announces Q1 2026 financial report; Liquid completes $18 million Series A financing; Polymarket plans to bring major exchanges to the U.S
Overview of Important Market Events on April 28

From a banned economist to the new CEO of Xinhua: Fu Peng has figured out the second half of traffic
This uproar in the crypto circle appears to be a cultural conflict between a traditional economist and a crypto OG, but looking deeper, it is merely the new fire leveraging Fu Peng's influence in the traditional financial sector to pry open a batch of client funds that were originally difficult to r...

Why Private Credit Became the First True Bridge from TradFi to DeFi
Unveiling the core logic of private credit leading RWA: it is no longer just simple tokenization, but rather a true reshaping of the practical value of asset on-chain through real returns and deep integration with the DeFi ecosystem.

Senior cryptocurrency investor: Blockchain is showing a siphoning effect on capital
Stablecoins are the first real-world assets on the blockchain, but they will not be the last. Every billion dollars in stablecoins generates $12.2 billion in economic activity and $19 million in protocol revenue annually; once capital is on the blockchain, it gains productivity and does not go back.

When traditional crypto derivatives start to subtract: Insights from Hyper Trade's products
Say goodbye to complex contracts, as crypto derivatives begin to "subtract": This article breaks down how Hyper Trade reduces hardcore risk pricing into "second-level multiple-choice questions," reshaping the trading experience for retail investors.

My view on blockchain has changed
In-depth Reflection on the Value of Blockchain Applications and the Time Dimension

Will AI Agents use bank cards? Why can't Agentic Payment avoid stablecoins and blockchain?
Why can't AI agents just swipe bank cards? An article to understand the new tiered payment system: stablecoins and blockchain are becoming the exclusive settlement language and verifiable trust foundation of the "machine economy" era.

Deconstructing 80 mainstream payment institutions and wallets worldwide
A comprehensive analysis of the global top 100 payment companies. Led by Alipay and WeChat, this article provides insights into the business logic and competitive advantages of over 80 top players.

The MiCA Fast Track for Cryptocurrency Licenses: Why OKX and BVNK Choose Malta
Countdown to the EU MiCA Licensing: Why do crypto giants like OKX choose Malta for their "first license"? A deep dive into the CASP license application process, business portfolio logic, and compliance pitfalls guide.

a16z Crypto: Stablecoins are rebuilding the global financial infrastructure
Stablecoins are evolving from cryptocurrency trading tools into a new infrastructure for global finance. They are not only changing cross-border payments but are also driving bank connectivity, corporate finance, foreign exchange liquidity, on-chain credit, and the globalization of the dollar into a...

ENI's RWA ambition: to create an enterprise-level BaaS platform that allows Web2 institutions to "go beyond just asset on-chain."
What are the differences between RWA 1.0 and RWA 2.0?

Morning Report | a16z releases global financial new stack report; Websea's withdrawal channel suspected of running away; Strategy purchased 3,273 bitcoins last week
Overview of Important Market Events on April 27

The most Crypto group of people is becoming the least Crypto
Hong Kong Carnival × Bangkok Money 20/20 Observation Notes

MSTR STRC In-depth Study: The BTC Financing Flywheel Behind the 11.5% Yield
STRC is a well-designed financing tool that transforms fixed income demand into buying pressure for Bitcoin.
Revisiting RWA: Nearly 50,000 people's first on-chain transaction was not Bitcoin, but stock indices and crude oil
The narrative of RWA is not about traditional finance trying to capture crypto users, but rather crypto trying to capture traditional users.
Altcoin Price Outlook 2026: The Rotation Is Coming — Just Not the Way You Think
Bitcoin dominance at 58%, Fear & Greed at 39. If you think altcoin season is dead, you're reading the wrong signals. Here's what the data actually says about what comes next.
Oracle: The Second Battlefield Behind the Prediction Market War
By 2026, the oracle track has essentially evolved from the early "data pipeline" into a "verifiable facts layer" that supports the entire on-chain economy, and prediction markets serve as a magnifying glass to observe the competition in this red ocean.
a16z's key bet: Kalshi's weekly trading volume approaches $3 billion, transitioning from "prediction games" to financial infrastructure, the market begins to price "uncertainty."
The evolution of prediction markets: from niche products to "uncertainty pricing" infrastructure
Morning Report | Galaxy Digital announces Q1 2026 financial report; Liquid completes $18 million Series A financing; Polymarket plans to bring major exchanges to the U.S
Overview of Important Market Events on April 28
From a banned economist to the new CEO of Xinhua: Fu Peng has figured out the second half of traffic
This uproar in the crypto circle appears to be a cultural conflict between a traditional economist and a crypto OG, but looking deeper, it is merely the new fire leveraging Fu Peng's influence in the traditional financial sector to pry open a batch of client funds that were originally difficult to r...
Customer Support:@weikecs
Business Cooperation:@weikecs
Quant Trading & MM:bd@weex.com
VIP Program:support@weex.com
