In-Depth Article Exposing the BTCFi TVL Scam, Nubit's "Proof of TVL" Report Explained
Original Authors: Nubit and Nebra
In the Bitcoin ecosystem, Total Value Locked (TVL) is a key metric that measures the scale and security of BTCFi (Bitcoin Finance) projects. However, as BTCFi expands, the controversy surrounding the authenticity of TVL data continues to escalate. False statistics, double counting, fake locking, and other phenomena are eroding user trust, challenging the transparency and credibility of the Bitcoin ecosystem.
In response to this phenomenon, leading Bitcoin ecosystem projects such as Nubit, Nebra, Bitcoin Layers, and Alpen Labs released the "Proof of TVL" report on January 5, 2025, addressing the opaque nature of the BTCFi field. They called for the establishment of a higher standard asset transparency verification mechanism and proposed an open-source TVL verification tool to provide strong support for the transparency of the Bitcoin ecosystem.

The following is the original text of the report:
Special thanks to Bitcoin Layers and Alpen Labs for their review and valuable feedback on this article.
The Evolution of BTCFi and Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs)
Bitcoin has long been the cornerstone of the digital asset ecosystem.
However, over the years, its utility has been primarily limited to serving as a store of value and a medium of exchange. It wasn't until 2023 when protocols like Babylon introduced the concept of Bitcoin staking, allowing users to lock up their BTC in a self-custodial manner and participate in a Proof-of-Stake consensus mechanism to earn rewards.
This innovation ushered in a new era for Bitcoin, now commonly referred to as BTCFi. This movement has empowered Bitcoin with unprecedented capabilities. Since then, Bitcoin is no longer just a passive holding asset but is able to actively participate in the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem.
To enhance the usability and liquidity of staked Bitcoin, a wave of Bitcoin Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs) emerged. These protocols act as custodians, allowing users to stake their BTC and receive tokenized credentials in return. These LSTs can be freely used in DeFi applications, including lending, trading, yield farming, and more. This model allows Bitcoin stakers to have the best of both worlds: earning staking rewards while engaging in a wide range of DeFi opportunities.
These LST protocols have rapidly gained user acceptance, with the total value locked (TVL) of related protocols reaching billions of dollars. TVL is typically seen as a key metric to measure user activity and protocol success.

However, we want to pose a critical question for the industry: How reliable is the TVL data reported for Bitcoin LST protocols?
Specifically, for BTC that the protocol cannot effectively custody or slash, should these assets be counted in TVL?
If the TVL data is inflated, it could potentially provide users and investors with a false sense of security. Inflated TVL data may mask the protocol's true liquidity and risk exposure, leading all parties involved to make incorrect decisions and potentially suffer losses.
Why is Tracking TVL for Bitcoin Liquid Staking Protocols Challenging?
In the context of Bitcoin staking, Bitcoin's unique UTXO model adds complexity that makes interpreting Total Value Locked (TVL) data challenging. This complexity erodes trust in Bitcoin Liquid Staking protocols (LST) and raises concerns about the sustainability of the entire BTCFi ecosystem.
Let's examine the reasons in detail.
Bitcoin adopts the UTXO model (Unspent Transaction Output), where each transaction creates a unique "Bitcoin unit" with specific spending conditions. For example:
Some UTXOs may require a private key signature to be spent.
More complex UTXOs may include multi-signature (multisig) requirements or timelocks.
Unlike Ethereum's account-based model, Bitcoin's UTXO model does not aggregate balances, making tracking and locking funds more complex—though not entirely infeasible. Therefore, TVL data for LST protocols is usually self-reported by the protocols. To validate this reported data, we need to start with a simple question:
How should the TVL of Bitcoin Liquid Staking protocols be calculated?
The goal of Bitcoin staking protocols is to provide economic security for layer 2 protocols (such as Rollups, Data Availability Layers (DAs), etc.). From this perspective, economic security is effective only when the staked Bitcoin is under the custody of the staking protocol and is slashable. Therefore, one thing is clear:
Unstaked or non-slashable BTC held in protocol custody should not be counted towards TVL.
How is Bitcoin Double-Staked TVL Faked?
Many Bitcoin yield farming protocols, in their pursuit of a high TVL (Total Value Locked), spare no effort to strike agreements with large holders (whales) to artificially inflate their TVL through "data washing."
Here is how they operate:
1. Whale Staking: A large BTC holder (whale) is incentivized to move their BTC to an address controlled jointly by the whale and the protocol, under the guise of "staking."
2. Whale Retains Control: After staking, the whale still retains ultimate control over the Unspent Transaction Outputs (UTXOs). The protocol cannot force redemption or enforce penalties (including slashing penalties), meaning that this capital was never truly at risk.
3. False TVL Inclusion: The protocol includes these UTXOs in its TVL, even though these funds are not meaningfully locked, and the whale can withdraw or reuse these funds at any time.
The reality is:
Users (whales) maintain full control over the funds: Whales can spend these BTC at any time or stake them in another protocol.
Non-slashable Pseudo-Staking: This "staking" process has no mandatory slashing conditions, making it essentially meaningless.
The essence of staking lies in safeguarding network security by incentivizing benign behavior and penalizing malicious behavior. Slashing ensures that participants face real financial loss risk when not complying with protocol rules or engaging in dishonest behavior. Without this mechanism, staking devolves into a farce of "staking for the sake of staking," serving no practical purpose.
Ask yourself: What is the true purpose of staking? It is not to inflate TVL data or make symbolic gestures but to safeguard the protocol's security through slashing mechanisms.
This brings to mind FTX's painful lesson. In the FTX collapse, the disconnect between reported figures (IOUs) and actual reserves (redeemable assets) ultimately led to a complete breakdown of user trust. If a protocol inflates its TVL data, can you truly believe it won't misuse your reserves behind the scenes? A protocol that distorts facts even on fundamental issues like reserves likely has strayed from the trustless principles that Bitcoin embodies.
This inflated TVL data has raised a larger question: Is the reported "staked" Bitcoin truly locked up? Or is this merely a ploy to attract attention and inflate the digital false metric?
The Risk of False TVL
In theory, Liquidity Staking Tokens (LSTs) are designed to represent Bitcoin staked in protocols like Babylon, allowing holders to earn staking rewards while maintaining asset liquidity. The premise of this mechanism is that each LST is fully backed by real Bitcoin reserves at a 1:1 ratio.
However, some staking arrangements that seek high TVL numbers may undermine these commitments. If some of the staked BTC remains under the control of the original owner while the protocol reports it as fully locked up, this directly threatens the fundamental assumption on which LSTs rely. The results could be:
The actual locked collateral is less than the reported amount.
The staking model fails to provide the expected security guarantees.
There is a significant gap between the reported TVL and the actual amount of BTC participating in staking.
Ultimately, these actions cast doubt on whether LSTs are truly backed by verifiable reserves and raise concerns about the economic security these tokens can provide, such as:
1. Lack of 1:1 Support Guarantee
Because the protocol counts untruly locked or staked Bitcoin as "staked," it cannot guarantee that the assets supporting LSTs actually exist or are under the protocol's control. Users holding these tokens can only rely on the protocol's unilateral statement. Additionally, if these assets do not exist, users face real financial loss risks when redeeming the underlying assets.
2. Unverifiable Staking Rewards
Staking rewards should come from real contributions to network security or Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus. However, when the underlying Bitcoin is not truly engaged in staking, where do these rewards come from? Are they sustainable?
This poses a systemic risk to the entire BTCFi ecosystem. As trust weakens, liquidity may rapidly dissipate, not only undermining a specific protocol but also potentially affecting the stability of the entire BTCFi ecosystem based on Bitcoin staking.
What Happens When a Bitcoin Staking Protocol Becomes No Different from a Centralized Entity? In such a scenario, users are unable to audit the reserve, having to rely solely on the operator's statement. This situation severely threatens the credibility of BTCFi.
The current state of affairs poses a survival threat to BTCFi's credibility. To avoid falling into the same trap of centralized systems and false TVL, we must address the root cause of the issue: the lack of a trustless and verifiable mechanism to prove the reserve and staking activities.
This is where Proof of TVL (PoTVL) comes into play. Only by establishing a scientific, transparent, and cryptographically based reserve verification standard can we rebuild trust in Bitcoin LSTs and ensure the long-term sustainability of the ecosystem.
Core Solution: Transparent TVL Computation
In the context of Bitcoin staking, Taproot addresses play a crucial role in implementing staking locking scripts (e.g., Babylon). These locking scripts define explicit rules for staking, tracking, and eventual withdrawal of BTC. Babylon is a prime example as it directly links staking behavior to verifiable protocol-level rules on the Bitcoin UTXO model.
When stakers engage in the staking protocol, they construct specific transactions to send BTC to the protocol's designated Taproot address. These transactions typically include:
1. Staking Output: A UTXO used to send BTC to the Taproot address for staking.
2. Ownership Proof Output: A second UTXO containing the staker's and protocol's public keys. These public keys prove ownership of the staked BTC.
Using the Babylon staking protocol specification as an example:
The specification requires stakers (or the LST protocol) to construct transactions as follows:
· The first UTXO sends BTC to the Taproot address bound to Babylon's staking locking script.
· The second UTXO contains the staker and Babylon's public key to ensure ownership verification.
This design ensures that the staking behavior can be fully traced on-chain, with clear ownership proof and transparent rules.
Case Study: Lombard Finance
To demonstrate the application of this approach in practice, we used the open-source Proof of TVL tool to validate Lombard Finance.
Here is the complete verification process:
1. Identify User Deposit Wallet
The process starts from user depositing BTC into Lombard's wallet. These wallets represent the initial fund flow into the system.
2. Trace Transactions to Staking Wallet
Track BTC from the deposit wallets to the staking wallet controlled by Lombard. Based on Babylon's staking specification, identify all staking transactions.
3. Verify Ownership
Use Babylon's protocol rules to confirm if the staking transactions include the required public key for ownership verification. Ensure that the transactions comply with the staking locking script.
4. Calculate True TVL
Aggregate the BTC output amounts in the validated staking transactions to calculate on-chain collateral. Compare the collateral to the total LBTC supply, and calculate the collateralization ratio.
Through the above steps, we calculated Lombard's LST TVL as follows:
· BTC On-chain Collateral: 16,580.9220 (15,028.3565 BTC / 90.64% staked)
· Total LBTC Supply: 16,386.4157 (101.19% overcollateralized)
· Latest Validation Timestamp: January 4, 2025, 7:30 PM PST
· Status: Secure (101.19% overcollateralized)

Validation Details:
· 90.64% Staked
Out of a total on-chain collateral of 16,580.9220 BTC, 15,028.3565 BTC is actively staked according to the Babylon standard.
· 101.19% Overcollateralized
The total supply of LBTC is 16,386.41, while the on-chain collateral is 16,599 BTC.
· Full On-chain Transparency
Each staking transaction can be directly traced back to the deposit address of the Lombard protocol, and ownership verification complies with the staking rules.
The validation process was completed on January 4, 2025, at 7:30 PM Pacific Time (at the time of writing), and this data is fully reproducible without any manual intervention. Through our open-source tool Proof of TVL, anyone can independently verify LBTC's TVL data in real-time.
This is true transparency.
While this solution provides a high level of transparency, it has a key drawback: it relies on a trust protocol to accurately calculate and report TVL.
So, is there a way to eliminate this reliance and allow anyone to confidently independently verify the results? Zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) offer a potential solution path.
Using Zero-Knowledge Proofs for TVL Verification
One major advantage of Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) is their encrypted trust mechanism, with extremely low validation costs, allowing users to directly verify ZKPs on client-side devices such as smartphones or browsers. This significantly reduces the friction and trust assumptions in TVL verification. Now, users don't even need to trust a third party running the TVL verification protocol.
The Zero-Knowledge Proof specifically designed for validating LST TVL is expressed as follows:
Reserve Proof from BTC + LST Wallet on Babylon above LST Total Supply
Reserve Proof from BTC on Babylon above LST
· According to Babylon's transaction specification: To have a transaction considered a valid staking transaction, the following conditions must be met:
· The transaction must have a Taproot output with key path spend disabled and committed to a script tree consisting of three scripts: a timelock script, an unbonding script, and a slashing script. This output is referred to as a staking_output, and its value is referred to as the staking_amount.
· The transaction must include an OP_RETURN output containing the following: global_parameters.tag, version, staker_pk (staking provider's public key), finality_provider_pk (finality provider's public key), staking_time (staking time).
To verify the LST on Babylon above BTC, we first need to validate the staking transaction. For example, verifying if the Taproot output and OP_RETURN contain the same public key.
Reserve Proof of LST Wallet
We can adopt a standard reserve proof protocol, such as the one proposed by Vitalik Buterin: Proof of Solvency Protocol.
In addition, Shumo et al. have proposed a slightly improved version.
Further reading: SNARKed Merkle Sum Tree: A Practical Proof of Solvency Protocol Based on Vitalik's Proposal.
The only technical detail is that we need to replace the signature algorithm used by Ethereum with the one used by Bitcoin. For example, while both Bitcoin and Ethereum use ECDSA, Bitcoin chose SHA instead of Keccak as the secure hash algorithm.
LST Total Supply
This is a user-provided public input.
By using zero-knowledge proofs for TVL verification, the counterpart risk can be effectively minimized, while reducing the barrier to entry for any user verification results.
The Future Roadmap of BTCFi
Bitcoin has always represented trust, decentralization, and transparency. However, with the proliferation of fake TVL data in the Bitcoin staking field, these core principles are at risk of erosion.
The solution is very clear: TVL verification through zero-knowledge proofs provides a clear path to achieving true accountability.
By eliminating reliance on trust and enabling reserves to be verified by anyone, we can rebuild user confidence in Bitcoin LST and ensure that BTCFi thrives on a "real" basis.
Ongoing Engagement
We believe in the power of collective progress. Here are ways you can help drive this process:
· Provide more TVL verification analyses: Help expand the tool's applicability, and contribute transparent analyses to other BTCFi protocols. Transparency is a collective effort across the entire ecosystem.
· Contribute PR: Improve the tool or propose new feature suggestions (e.g., implementation of zk-proofs).
· Develop industry standards: Collaborate with us to create open, verifiable BTCFi transparency standards.
· Spread the word: Share this article to raise awareness of the need for trustless TVL verification.
Attachment: Full report and verification tool open-source link
ReportOriginal Article Link
You may also like
$COIN Joins S&P 500, but Coinbase Isn't Celebrating
On May 13, S&P Dow Jones Indices announced that Coinbase would officially replace Discover Financial Services in the S&P 500 on May 19. While other companies like Block and MicroStrategy, closely tied to Bitcoin, were already part of the S&P 500, Coinbase became the first cryptocurrency exchange whose primary business is in the index. This also signifies that cryptocurrency is gradually moving from the fringes to the mainstream in the U.S.
On the day of the announcement, Coinbase's stock price surged by 23%, surpassing the $250 mark. However, just 3 days later, Coinbase was hit by two consecutive events: a hack where employees were bribed to steal customer data and a demand for a $20 million ransom, and an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into the authenticity of its claim of having over 100 million "verified users" in its securities filings and marketing materials. These two events acted as mini-bombs, and at the time of writing, Coinbase's stock had already dropped by over 7.3%.
Coincidentally, Discover Financial Services, being replaced by Coinbase, can also be considered the "Coinbase" of the previous payment era. Discover is a U.S.-based digital banking and payment services company headquartered in Illinois, founded in 1960. Its payment network, Discover Network, is the fourth largest payment network apart from Visa, Mastercard, and American Express.
In April, after the approval of the acquisition of Discover by the sixth-largest U.S. bank, Capital One, this well-established digital banking company of over 60 years smoothly handed over its S&P 500 "seat" to this emerging cryptocurrency "bank." This unexpected coincidence also portrayed the handover between the new and old eras in Coinbase's entry into the S&P 500, resembling a relay race scene. However, this relay baton also brought Coinbase's accumulated "external troubles and internal strife" to a tipping point.
Over the past decade, cryptocurrency exchanges have been the most stable "profit machines." They play a role in providing liquidity to the entire industry and rely on trading fees to sustain their operations. However, with the comprehensive rollout of ETF products in the U.S. market, this profit model is facing unprecedented challenges. As the leader in the "American stack," with over 80% of its business coming from the U.S., Coinbase is most affected by this.
Starting from the approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, traditional financial capital has significantly onboarded users and funds that originally belonged to exchanges in a more cost-effective, compliant, and transparent manner. The transaction fee revenue of cryptocurrency exchanges has started to decline, and this trend may further intensify in the coming months.
According to Coinbase's 2024 Q4 financial report, the platform's total trading revenue was $417 million, a 45% year-on-year decrease. The contribution of BTC and ETH's trading revenue dropped from 65% in the same period last year to less than 50%.
This decline is not a result of a decrease in market enthusiasm. In fact, since the approval of the Bitcoin ETF in January 2024, the inflow of BTC into the U.S. market has continued to reach new highs, with asset management giants like BlackRock and Fidelity rapidly expanding their management scale. Data shows that BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) alone has surpassed $17 billion in assets under management. As of mid-May 2025, the cumulative net inflow of 11 major institutional Bitcoin spot ETFs on the market has exceeded $41.5 billion, with a total net asset value of $1214.69 billion, accounting for approximately 5.91% of the total Bitcoin market capitalization.
Institutional investors and some retail investors are shifting towards ETF products, partly due to compliance and tax considerations. On one hand, ETFs have much lower trading costs compared to cryptocurrency exchanges. While Coinbase's spot trading fee rate varies annually in a tiered manner but averages around 1.49%, for example, the management fee for IBIT ETF is only 0.25%, and the majority of ETF institution fees fluctuate around 0.15% to 0.25%.
In other words, the more rational users are, the more likely they are to move from exchanges to ETF products, especially for investors aiming for long-term holdings.
According to multiple sources, several institutions, including VanEck and Grayscale, have submitted applications to the SEC for a Solana (SOL) ETF, with some institutions also planning to submit an XRP ETF proposal. Once approved, this may trigger a new round of fund migration. According to a report submitted by Coinbase to the SEC, as of April, the platform's trading revenue from XRP and Solana accounted for 18% and 10%, nearly one-third of the platform's fee revenue.
However, the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs passed in 2024 also reduced the fees for these two tokens on Coinbase from 30% and 15% to 26% and 10%, respectively. If the SOL and XRP ETFs are approved, it will further undermine the core fee revenue of exchanges like Coinbase.
The expansion of ETF products is gradually weakening the financial intermediary status of cryptocurrency exchanges. From their original roles as matchmakers and clearers to now gradually becoming mere "on-ramps and off-ramps" for funds, exchanges are seeing their marginal value squeezed by ETFs.
On May 12, 2025, SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins gave a keynote speech at the Tokenization and Cryptocurrency Working Group roundtable. The theme of his speech revolved around "It is a new day at the SEC," where he indicated that the SEC would not approach enforcement and regulation the same way as before but would instead pave the way for cryptocurrency assets in the U.S. market.
With signs of cryptocurrency compliance such as the SEC's "NEW DAY" declaration, an increasing number of traditional brokerages are attempting to enter the cryptocurrency industry. One of the most representative cases is the well-known U.S. brokerage Robinhood, which began expanding its crypto business in 2018. By the time of its IPO in 2021, Robinhood's crypto business revenue accounted for over 50% of the company, with a significant boost from the Dogecoin "moonshot" promoted by Musk.
In Q1 2025 earnings report, Robinhood showcased strong growth, especially in revenue from cryptocurrency and options trading. Fueled by Trump's Memecoin, cryptocurrency-related revenue reached $250 million, nearly doubling year-over-year. Consequently, Robinhood Gold subscription users reached 3.5 million, a 90% increase from the previous year, with the rapid growth of Robinhood Gold providing the company with a stable source of income.
Meanwhile, RobinHood is actively pursuing acquisitions in the cryptocurrency space. In 2024, it announced a $2 billion acquisition of the long-standing European cryptocurrency exchange Bitstamp. Additionally, Canada's largest cryptocurrency CEX, WonderFi, which recently went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange, also announced its integration with RobinHood Crypto. After obtaining virtual asset licenses in the UK, Canada, Singapore, and other markets, RobinHood has taken a proactive approach in the compliant cryptocurrency trading market.
Furthermore, an increasing number of brokerage firms are exploring the same path. Futu Securities, Tiger Brokers, and others are also dipping their toes into cryptocurrency trading, with some having applied for or obtained the VA license from the Hong Kong SFC. Although their user bases are currently small, traditional brokerages have a natural advantage in user trust, regulatory licenses, and low fee structures. This could pose a threat to native cryptocurrency platforms in the future.
In April 2025, security researchers discovered that some Coinbase user data was leaked on the dark web. While the platform initially responded by attributing it to a "technical misinformation," it still raised concerns among users regarding its security and privacy protection. Just two days before Dow Jones Indexes announced Coinbase's addition to the S&P 500 Index, on May 11, 2025, Coinbase received an email from an unknown threat actor claiming to have obtained customer account information and internal documents, demanding a $20 million ransom to keep the data private. Subsequent investigations confirmed the data breach.
Cybercriminals obtained the data by bribing overseas customer service agents and support staff, mainly in "non-U.S. regions such as India." These agents abused their access to Coinbase's internal customer support system and stole customer data. As early as February this year, blockchain detective ZachXBT revealed on X platform that between December 2024 and January 2025, Coinbase users lost over $65 million to social engineering scams, with the actual amount potentially higher.
Among the victims was a well-known figure, 67-year-old Ed Suman, an established artist in the art world for nearly two decades, having been involved in the creation of artworks such as Jeff Koons' "Balloon Dog" sculpture. Earlier this year, he fell victim to an impersonation scam involving fake Coinbase customer support, resulting in a loss of over $2 million in cryptocurrency. ZachXBT critiqued Coinbase for its inadequate handling of such scams, noting that other major exchanges have not faced similar issues and recommending Coinbase to enhance its security measures.
Amidst a series of ongoing social engineering incidents, although there has not been any impact on user assets at the technical level so far, it has raised concerns among many retail and institutional investors. Especially institutions holding massive assets on Coinbase. Just considering the U.S. BTC ETF institutions, as of mid-May 2025, they collectively hold nearly 840,000 BTC, and 75% of these are custodied by Coinbase. If we price BTC at $100,000, this amount reaches a staggering $63 billion, which is equivalent to the nominal GDP of two Iceland in the year 2024.
In addition, Coinbase Custody also serves over 300 institutional clients, including hedge funds, family offices, pension funds, and endowments. As of the Q1 2025 financial report, Coinbase's total assets under management (including institutional and retail clients) reached $404 billion. The specific amount of institutional custodied assets was not explicitly disclosed in the latest report, but it should still be over 50% based on the Q4 2024 report.
Once this security barrier is breached, not only could the rate of user attrition far exceed expectations, but more importantly, institutional trust in it would undermine the foundation of its business. Therefore, after a hacking event, Coinbase's stock price plummeted significantly.
Facing a decline in spot trading fee revenue, Coinbase is also accelerating its transformation, attempting to find growth opportunities in derivatives and emerging assets. Coinbase acquired a stake in the options platform Deribit at the end of 2024 and announced the official launch of perpetual contract products in 2025. This acquisition fills in Coinbase's gap in options trading and its relatively small global market share.
Deribit has a strong presence in non-U.S. markets, especially in Asia and Europe. The acquisition has enabled Coinbase to gain a dominant position in bitcoin and ethereum options trading on Deribit, accounting for approximately 80% of the global options trading volume, with daily trading volume remaining above $2 billion.
Meanwhile, 80-90% of Deribit's customer base consists of institutional investors, with their professionalism and liquidity in the Bitcoin and Ethereum options market highly favored by institutions. Coinbase's compliance advantage, coupled with its already robust institutional ecosystem, makes it even more suitable. By using institutions as an entry point, it can face the squeeze from giants like Binance and OKX in the derivatives market.
Facing a similar dilemma is Kraken, which is attempting to replicate Binance Futures' model in non-U.S. markets. Since the derivatives market relies more on professional users, fee rates are relatively higher and stickiness is stronger, making it a significant source of revenue for exchanges. In the first half of 2025, Kraken completed the acquisition of TradeStation Crypto and a futures exchange, aiming to build a complete derivatives trading ecosystem to hedge the risk of declining spot transaction fee income.
With the surge of Memecoin in 2024, Binance, OKX, and various CEX platforms began massively listing small-market-cap, highly volatile tokens to activate active trading users. Due to the wealth effect and trading activity of Memecoins, Coinbase was also forced to join the battle, successively listing popular tokens from the Solana ecosystem such as BOOK OF MEME and Dogwifhat. Although these coins are controversial, they are frequently traded, with fee rates several times higher than mainstream coins, serving as a "blood-boosting" method for spot trading.
However, due to its status as a publicly traded company, this practice is a riskier endeavor for Coinbase. Even in the current crypto-friendly environment, the SEC is still investigating whether tokens like SOL, ADA, and SAND constitute securities.
In addition to the forced transformation strategies carried out by the aforementioned CEXs, they are also starting to lay out RWAs and the most talked-about stablecoin payment fields, such as the PYUSD launched through a collaboration between Coinbase and Paypal, Coinbase's support for the Euro stablecoin EURC by Circle that complies with EU MiCA regulatory requirements, or the USD1 launched through a collaboration between Binance and WIFL. In the increasingly crowded trading field, many CEXs have shifted their focus from just the trading market to the application field.
The golden age of transaction fees has quietly ended, and the second half of the crypto exchange platform game has silently begun.
Arthur Hayes: Why I'm Betting on ETH While the Market Is Obsessed with SOL
May 16 Key Market Information Gap, A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report
Key Market Intelligence on May 14th, how much did you miss out on?
1.Binance Alpha Launches HIPPO, BLUE, and Other Tokens
2.Believe Ecosystem Tokens See General Rise, LAUNCHCOIN Surges Over 250% in 24 Hours
3.Tiger Securities Introduces Cryptocurrency Deposit and Withdrawal Service, Supports Mainstream Cryptocurrencies such as BTC and ETH
4.Current Bitcoin Rally Possibly Driven by Institutions, Retail Traders Yet to Join
5.Binance Wallet's New TGE Privasea AI Participation Requires a 198 Point Threshold, with a Point Consumption of 15
Source: Overheard on CT (tg: @overheardonct), Kaito
PUMP: Today's discussions about PUMP focus on its new creator revenue-sharing model: the platform will allocate 50% of PumpSwap revenue to token creators, sparking varied reactions from users. Some criticize the move as insufficient or even misleading, while others view it as a positive step the platform is taking to reward creators. Meanwhile, PUMP faces market pressure from emerging competitors like LetsBONKfun and Raydium, which are rapidly gaining market share. Users also express concerns about PUMP's sustainability and potential regulatory risks in the U.S., with discussions extending to the platform's impact on the entire memecoin ecosystem.
COINBASE: Today, Coinbase became the first crypto company to join the S&P 500 Index, replacing Discover Financial Services, sparking widespread industry attention. The entire crypto community views this milestone as a significant development, signaling that crypto assets are further integrating into the mainstream financial system. The news has sparked lively discussions on Twitter, with many users pointing out that this may attract more institutional investors to enter the Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency markets.
XRP: XRP became the focal point of today's crypto discussion, with its significant market movements and strategic advances drawing attention. XRP has surpassed USDT to become the third-largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization, sparking market excitement and discussions about its future potential. The surge in market capitalization and price is believed to be related to increasing institutional interest, deepening strategic partnerships, and its role in the crypto ecosystem. Additionally, XRP's integration into multiple financial systems and its potential as a macro asset class are also seen as key factors driving the current market sentiment.
DYDX: Today's discussions about DYDX mainly focused on the dYdX Yapper Leaderboard launched by KaitoAI. The leaderboard aims to identify the most active community participants, with a total of $150,000 in rewards to be distributed over the first three seasons. This initiative has sparked broad community participation, with many users discussing the potential rewards and the incentive effect on the DYDX ecosystem. Meanwhile, progress on the ethDYDX to dYdX native chain migration and historical airdrop events have also been topics of discussion.
1. "What Is 'ICM'? Holding Up the $4 Billion Market Cap Solana's New Narrative"
Overnight, the hottest narrative in the crypto space has become "Internet Capital Markets," with a host of crypto projects and founders, led by the Solana ecosystem's new Launchpad platform Believe, releasing this phrase. Together with "Believe in something," it has become the new slogan heralding the onset of a bull market. What exactly is the so-called "Internet Capital Market," will it become a short-lived hype phrase like the Base ecosystem's previous Content Coin, and what related targets are available for selection?2.《LaunchCoin Surges 20x in One Day, How Did Believe Create a $200M Market Cap Shiba Inu After Going to Zero?|100x Retrospective》
LAUNCHCOIN broke through a $200 million market cap today, with the long-lost liquidity and such a high market cap "Memecoin" almost bringing half of the on-chain crypto community CT into the fray. The community is crazily discussing this token, with half of it being FOMO and the other half being FUD. This token, originally issued by Believe founder Ben Pasternak under his personal identity, transformed into a new platform token after a renaming. From once going to zero to a $200 million market cap, what happened in between?May 14 On-chain Fund Flow
RWA Evergreen Product Crisis: Why is the GLP Model Doomed to Collapse Under RWA Evergreen?
Week 16 On-Chain Data: Intensifying Structural Supply-Demand Imbalance, Data Reveals Solid Blueprint for Next Bull Run?
Sui Q1 Advanced Report: The Rise of BTCfi Infrastructure, the Boom of Lending Protocols, and the Future of Rollup-Based Scalability
Crypto Developer: The Trump Family's Coin Minting Real Estate Business
SignalPlus Macro Analysis: The Tariff-Torn M2 Narrative and the Return of TradFi-Style FOMO
After El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele signed it, which U.S. states have been **"good, good"** in advancing Bitcoin strategic reserve legislation?
PENGU Experiences Strong Rebound from Bottom with 360% Surge, How Will the Fat Penguin Leverage IP Marketing for a Comeback?
Arthur Hayes Interview: Bitcoin Has Bottomed, Which Tokens Can Outperform Bitcoin?
Ika Receives Strategic Investment from Sui Foundation, Total Funding Exceeds $21 Million
Switzerland Zug, April 28, 2025, Chainwire
The world's fastest parallel MPC network, Ika, is set to launch on the Sui blockchain, announces a strategic investment from the Sui Foundation. Previously, Ika successfully completed a record-breaking 1.4 million SUI NFT art event on Sui. Ika is the world's first sub-second MPC network, capable of achieving zero-trust interoperability among hundreds of signing nodes, unprecedented in scale and rock-solid security.
Ika's core values of performance, speed, and high decentralization align perfectly with Sui. With its upcoming launch on the Sui blockchain, Ika will bring its unparalleled MPC technology into the Sui ecosystem, providing Sui Move smart contract developers with secure cross-Web3 interoperability. This further solidifies Sui's position as the preferred solution in cross-chain DeFi, decentralized custody, chain abstraction, AI-agent defense, native Bitcoin programmability, leveraging the first truly scalable and secure MPC signature scheme.
Ika addresses key bottlenecks of existing MPC networks and delivers unparalleled performance through innovative 2PC-MPC encryption scheme and Sui's Mysticeti consensus protocol:
1. Record Throughput: Ika's transaction processing capability is up to 10,000 times higher than current MPC networks, supporting unprecedented transaction volumes.
2. Ultra-Low Latency: While traditional network signatures may experience delays of 30 seconds or more, Ika can generate signatures in sub-seconds, supporting cross-chain real-time applications.
3. Tremendous Scalability: Ika breaks the conventional limit of 4-8 nodes, and the 2PC-MPC can scale to hundreds or even thousands of signers, enhancing decentralization without sacrificing performance.
4. Zero-Trust Security: Ika's architecture ensures that even in the most extreme scenarios, user assets remain secure, setting a new standard for decentralized security.
Ika's ultra-fast MPC network supports various applications on the Sui blockchain, and several Sui developers have utilized Ika to build tech, including:
· DeFi Interoperability: Ika's sub-second speed and scalability enable instant secure operations within the Web3 ecosystem, bringing liquidity from chains like Bitcoin and Ethereum into Sui. Sui developers Full Sail and Rhei have announced upcoming tech launches based on Ika.
· Decentralized Custody: Ika provides a secure, decentralized custody solution for digital assets on Sui, delivering unparalleled security for both institutional and individual users. Sui developers Aeon and Human Tech have announced the integration of Ika into their technology.
· Chain Abstraction: Ika helps Sui developers abstract away multi-chain complexity for users, combining with Sui's zkLogin feature to deliver a seamless user experience. Sui developers Covault and Lucky Kat have announced the integration of Ika into their technology.
· Programmable Bitcoin: Ika unlocks new possibilities for native BTC on Sui, enabling programmable and secure DeFi and custody. Sui developers Native and Nativerse have announced the upcoming launch of Ika-based technology.
· AI Agent Protection: Ika enhances AI applications on Sui by providing secure MPC protection, ensuring AI agents do not possess unrestricted power and safeguarding user asset security. Sui developers Atoma and Ekko have announced the upcoming launch of Ika-based technology.
The strategic investment in Ika by the Sui Foundation underscores Sui's commitment to driving cutting-edge technology for high performance and decentralization. This amplifies the technical synergy within the Sui ecosystem, propelling Sui and Ika to the forefront of the Web3 revolution, jointly advancing the future of secure, scalable, decentralized infrastructure.
Ika has raised over $21 million in funding, with a peak private valuation of $6 billion FDV, backed by support from Sui Foundation, DCG, Big Brain Holdings, Blockchange, Node Capital, Amplify Partners, Liquid2 Ventures, FalconX, Tykhe Block Ventures, Lightshift, Token Bay Capital, Collider, Zero Knowledge Ventures, NoLimit Holdings, Rubik Ventures, Dispersion Capital, Insignius Capital, Impatient Ventures, Cerulean Ventures, Earl Grey Capital, HDI Ventures, Flowdesk, TPC Ventures, Purechain Capital, Solr DAO, Heroic Ventures, Naval Ravikant, NotVCs, G-20 Group, Artifact Capital, DSRV, Encapsulate, and many other key players in the Web3 space.
Ika also demonstrated the strong support of Sui users by launching the "MF Squid Market" NFT art event, which became the largest and most successful NFT event in Sui's history, raising over 1.4 million SUI and establishing an active grassroots community.
The IKA token is set to native launch on the Sui blockchain, unlocking new decentralized security features and utilities. As the native token of the Ika MPC Network, IKA will play a key role in its ultra-fast, scalable infrastructure, used for paying MPC signature services, enabling seamless transactions within the Web3 ecosystem. Leveraging Sui's unparalleled speed and performance, Ika enhances the security and scalability of the entire ecosystem, introducing the most promising MPC technology in blockchain to the fastest-growing L1 of Web3.
Ika is the world's fastest parallel MPC network, offering sub-second latency, unprecedented scale and decentralization, and zero-trust security. As the preferred choice for interoperability, decentralized custody, and chain abstraction, Ika will fundamentally transform digital asset security and multi-chain DeFi.
Sui is the first Layer 1 blockchain and smart contract platform designed from the ground up to provide fast, private, secure, and inclusive digital assets. Built on the Move programming language, its object-centric model supports parallel execution, sub-second finality, and rich on-chain assets. Through horizontally scalable processing and storage capacity, Sui supports widespread applications at low cost with unparalleled speed. Sui represents a significant advancement in blockchain technology, offering creators and developers a platform to build exceptional user experiences.
Contact:
Ika PR
pr@ika.xyz (mailto:pr@ika.xyz)
Exclusive Interview with AllianceDAO Partner qw: Crypto Entrepreneurs Are Fleeing to AI, 90% of Crypto+AI Projects Are Misleading
Stablecoin Showdown: Six Rising Stars Enter the Fray, Will the Market Structure Shift?
Deep Dive into Dubai's Crypto Dream: Illusion, Capital, and Decentralized Empire
Large companies buying Bitcoin has become a trend, but Asian companies hold less than 1% of the total supply
The "Yearn Finance" Effect: Cryptocurrency Funds Experience the Calm Before the Dawn
$COIN Joins S&P 500, but Coinbase Isn't Celebrating
On May 13, S&P Dow Jones Indices announced that Coinbase would officially replace Discover Financial Services in the S&P 500 on May 19. While other companies like Block and MicroStrategy, closely tied to Bitcoin, were already part of the S&P 500, Coinbase became the first cryptocurrency exchange whose primary business is in the index. This also signifies that cryptocurrency is gradually moving from the fringes to the mainstream in the U.S.
On the day of the announcement, Coinbase's stock price surged by 23%, surpassing the $250 mark. However, just 3 days later, Coinbase was hit by two consecutive events: a hack where employees were bribed to steal customer data and a demand for a $20 million ransom, and an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into the authenticity of its claim of having over 100 million "verified users" in its securities filings and marketing materials. These two events acted as mini-bombs, and at the time of writing, Coinbase's stock had already dropped by over 7.3%.
Coincidentally, Discover Financial Services, being replaced by Coinbase, can also be considered the "Coinbase" of the previous payment era. Discover is a U.S.-based digital banking and payment services company headquartered in Illinois, founded in 1960. Its payment network, Discover Network, is the fourth largest payment network apart from Visa, Mastercard, and American Express.
In April, after the approval of the acquisition of Discover by the sixth-largest U.S. bank, Capital One, this well-established digital banking company of over 60 years smoothly handed over its S&P 500 "seat" to this emerging cryptocurrency "bank." This unexpected coincidence also portrayed the handover between the new and old eras in Coinbase's entry into the S&P 500, resembling a relay race scene. However, this relay baton also brought Coinbase's accumulated "external troubles and internal strife" to a tipping point.
Over the past decade, cryptocurrency exchanges have been the most stable "profit machines." They play a role in providing liquidity to the entire industry and rely on trading fees to sustain their operations. However, with the comprehensive rollout of ETF products in the U.S. market, this profit model is facing unprecedented challenges. As the leader in the "American stack," with over 80% of its business coming from the U.S., Coinbase is most affected by this.
Starting from the approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, traditional financial capital has significantly onboarded users and funds that originally belonged to exchanges in a more cost-effective, compliant, and transparent manner. The transaction fee revenue of cryptocurrency exchanges has started to decline, and this trend may further intensify in the coming months.
According to Coinbase's 2024 Q4 financial report, the platform's total trading revenue was $417 million, a 45% year-on-year decrease. The contribution of BTC and ETH's trading revenue dropped from 65% in the same period last year to less than 50%.
This decline is not a result of a decrease in market enthusiasm. In fact, since the approval of the Bitcoin ETF in January 2024, the inflow of BTC into the U.S. market has continued to reach new highs, with asset management giants like BlackRock and Fidelity rapidly expanding their management scale. Data shows that BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) alone has surpassed $17 billion in assets under management. As of mid-May 2025, the cumulative net inflow of 11 major institutional Bitcoin spot ETFs on the market has exceeded $41.5 billion, with a total net asset value of $1214.69 billion, accounting for approximately 5.91% of the total Bitcoin market capitalization.
Institutional investors and some retail investors are shifting towards ETF products, partly due to compliance and tax considerations. On one hand, ETFs have much lower trading costs compared to cryptocurrency exchanges. While Coinbase's spot trading fee rate varies annually in a tiered manner but averages around 1.49%, for example, the management fee for IBIT ETF is only 0.25%, and the majority of ETF institution fees fluctuate around 0.15% to 0.25%.
In other words, the more rational users are, the more likely they are to move from exchanges to ETF products, especially for investors aiming for long-term holdings.
According to multiple sources, several institutions, including VanEck and Grayscale, have submitted applications to the SEC for a Solana (SOL) ETF, with some institutions also planning to submit an XRP ETF proposal. Once approved, this may trigger a new round of fund migration. According to a report submitted by Coinbase to the SEC, as of April, the platform's trading revenue from XRP and Solana accounted for 18% and 10%, nearly one-third of the platform's fee revenue.
However, the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs passed in 2024 also reduced the fees for these two tokens on Coinbase from 30% and 15% to 26% and 10%, respectively. If the SOL and XRP ETFs are approved, it will further undermine the core fee revenue of exchanges like Coinbase.
The expansion of ETF products is gradually weakening the financial intermediary status of cryptocurrency exchanges. From their original roles as matchmakers and clearers to now gradually becoming mere "on-ramps and off-ramps" for funds, exchanges are seeing their marginal value squeezed by ETFs.
On May 12, 2025, SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins gave a keynote speech at the Tokenization and Cryptocurrency Working Group roundtable. The theme of his speech revolved around "It is a new day at the SEC," where he indicated that the SEC would not approach enforcement and regulation the same way as before but would instead pave the way for cryptocurrency assets in the U.S. market.
With signs of cryptocurrency compliance such as the SEC's "NEW DAY" declaration, an increasing number of traditional brokerages are attempting to enter the cryptocurrency industry. One of the most representative cases is the well-known U.S. brokerage Robinhood, which began expanding its crypto business in 2018. By the time of its IPO in 2021, Robinhood's crypto business revenue accounted for over 50% of the company, with a significant boost from the Dogecoin "moonshot" promoted by Musk.
In Q1 2025 earnings report, Robinhood showcased strong growth, especially in revenue from cryptocurrency and options trading. Fueled by Trump's Memecoin, cryptocurrency-related revenue reached $250 million, nearly doubling year-over-year. Consequently, Robinhood Gold subscription users reached 3.5 million, a 90% increase from the previous year, with the rapid growth of Robinhood Gold providing the company with a stable source of income.
Meanwhile, RobinHood is actively pursuing acquisitions in the cryptocurrency space. In 2024, it announced a $2 billion acquisition of the long-standing European cryptocurrency exchange Bitstamp. Additionally, Canada's largest cryptocurrency CEX, WonderFi, which recently went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange, also announced its integration with RobinHood Crypto. After obtaining virtual asset licenses in the UK, Canada, Singapore, and other markets, RobinHood has taken a proactive approach in the compliant cryptocurrency trading market.
Furthermore, an increasing number of brokerage firms are exploring the same path. Futu Securities, Tiger Brokers, and others are also dipping their toes into cryptocurrency trading, with some having applied for or obtained the VA license from the Hong Kong SFC. Although their user bases are currently small, traditional brokerages have a natural advantage in user trust, regulatory licenses, and low fee structures. This could pose a threat to native cryptocurrency platforms in the future.
In April 2025, security researchers discovered that some Coinbase user data was leaked on the dark web. While the platform initially responded by attributing it to a "technical misinformation," it still raised concerns among users regarding its security and privacy protection. Just two days before Dow Jones Indexes announced Coinbase's addition to the S&P 500 Index, on May 11, 2025, Coinbase received an email from an unknown threat actor claiming to have obtained customer account information and internal documents, demanding a $20 million ransom to keep the data private. Subsequent investigations confirmed the data breach.
Cybercriminals obtained the data by bribing overseas customer service agents and support staff, mainly in "non-U.S. regions such as India." These agents abused their access to Coinbase's internal customer support system and stole customer data. As early as February this year, blockchain detective ZachXBT revealed on X platform that between December 2024 and January 2025, Coinbase users lost over $65 million to social engineering scams, with the actual amount potentially higher.
Among the victims was a well-known figure, 67-year-old Ed Suman, an established artist in the art world for nearly two decades, having been involved in the creation of artworks such as Jeff Koons' "Balloon Dog" sculpture. Earlier this year, he fell victim to an impersonation scam involving fake Coinbase customer support, resulting in a loss of over $2 million in cryptocurrency. ZachXBT critiqued Coinbase for its inadequate handling of such scams, noting that other major exchanges have not faced similar issues and recommending Coinbase to enhance its security measures.
Amidst a series of ongoing social engineering incidents, although there has not been any impact on user assets at the technical level so far, it has raised concerns among many retail and institutional investors. Especially institutions holding massive assets on Coinbase. Just considering the U.S. BTC ETF institutions, as of mid-May 2025, they collectively hold nearly 840,000 BTC, and 75% of these are custodied by Coinbase. If we price BTC at $100,000, this amount reaches a staggering $63 billion, which is equivalent to the nominal GDP of two Iceland in the year 2024.
In addition, Coinbase Custody also serves over 300 institutional clients, including hedge funds, family offices, pension funds, and endowments. As of the Q1 2025 financial report, Coinbase's total assets under management (including institutional and retail clients) reached $404 billion. The specific amount of institutional custodied assets was not explicitly disclosed in the latest report, but it should still be over 50% based on the Q4 2024 report.
Once this security barrier is breached, not only could the rate of user attrition far exceed expectations, but more importantly, institutional trust in it would undermine the foundation of its business. Therefore, after a hacking event, Coinbase's stock price plummeted significantly.
Facing a decline in spot trading fee revenue, Coinbase is also accelerating its transformation, attempting to find growth opportunities in derivatives and emerging assets. Coinbase acquired a stake in the options platform Deribit at the end of 2024 and announced the official launch of perpetual contract products in 2025. This acquisition fills in Coinbase's gap in options trading and its relatively small global market share.
Deribit has a strong presence in non-U.S. markets, especially in Asia and Europe. The acquisition has enabled Coinbase to gain a dominant position in bitcoin and ethereum options trading on Deribit, accounting for approximately 80% of the global options trading volume, with daily trading volume remaining above $2 billion.
Meanwhile, 80-90% of Deribit's customer base consists of institutional investors, with their professionalism and liquidity in the Bitcoin and Ethereum options market highly favored by institutions. Coinbase's compliance advantage, coupled with its already robust institutional ecosystem, makes it even more suitable. By using institutions as an entry point, it can face the squeeze from giants like Binance and OKX in the derivatives market.
Facing a similar dilemma is Kraken, which is attempting to replicate Binance Futures' model in non-U.S. markets. Since the derivatives market relies more on professional users, fee rates are relatively higher and stickiness is stronger, making it a significant source of revenue for exchanges. In the first half of 2025, Kraken completed the acquisition of TradeStation Crypto and a futures exchange, aiming to build a complete derivatives trading ecosystem to hedge the risk of declining spot transaction fee income.
With the surge of Memecoin in 2024, Binance, OKX, and various CEX platforms began massively listing small-market-cap, highly volatile tokens to activate active trading users. Due to the wealth effect and trading activity of Memecoins, Coinbase was also forced to join the battle, successively listing popular tokens from the Solana ecosystem such as BOOK OF MEME and Dogwifhat. Although these coins are controversial, they are frequently traded, with fee rates several times higher than mainstream coins, serving as a "blood-boosting" method for spot trading.
However, due to its status as a publicly traded company, this practice is a riskier endeavor for Coinbase. Even in the current crypto-friendly environment, the SEC is still investigating whether tokens like SOL, ADA, and SAND constitute securities.
In addition to the forced transformation strategies carried out by the aforementioned CEXs, they are also starting to lay out RWAs and the most talked-about stablecoin payment fields, such as the PYUSD launched through a collaboration between Coinbase and Paypal, Coinbase's support for the Euro stablecoin EURC by Circle that complies with EU MiCA regulatory requirements, or the USD1 launched through a collaboration between Binance and WIFL. In the increasingly crowded trading field, many CEXs have shifted their focus from just the trading market to the application field.
The golden age of transaction fees has quietly ended, and the second half of the crypto exchange platform game has silently begun.
Arthur Hayes: Why I'm Betting on ETH While the Market Is Obsessed with SOL
May 16 Key Market Information Gap, A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report
Key Market Intelligence on May 14th, how much did you miss out on?
1.Binance Alpha Launches HIPPO, BLUE, and Other Tokens
2.Believe Ecosystem Tokens See General Rise, LAUNCHCOIN Surges Over 250% in 24 Hours
3.Tiger Securities Introduces Cryptocurrency Deposit and Withdrawal Service, Supports Mainstream Cryptocurrencies such as BTC and ETH
4.Current Bitcoin Rally Possibly Driven by Institutions, Retail Traders Yet to Join
5.Binance Wallet's New TGE Privasea AI Participation Requires a 198 Point Threshold, with a Point Consumption of 15
Source: Overheard on CT (tg: @overheardonct), Kaito
PUMP: Today's discussions about PUMP focus on its new creator revenue-sharing model: the platform will allocate 50% of PumpSwap revenue to token creators, sparking varied reactions from users. Some criticize the move as insufficient or even misleading, while others view it as a positive step the platform is taking to reward creators. Meanwhile, PUMP faces market pressure from emerging competitors like LetsBONKfun and Raydium, which are rapidly gaining market share. Users also express concerns about PUMP's sustainability and potential regulatory risks in the U.S., with discussions extending to the platform's impact on the entire memecoin ecosystem.
COINBASE: Today, Coinbase became the first crypto company to join the S&P 500 Index, replacing Discover Financial Services, sparking widespread industry attention. The entire crypto community views this milestone as a significant development, signaling that crypto assets are further integrating into the mainstream financial system. The news has sparked lively discussions on Twitter, with many users pointing out that this may attract more institutional investors to enter the Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency markets.
XRP: XRP became the focal point of today's crypto discussion, with its significant market movements and strategic advances drawing attention. XRP has surpassed USDT to become the third-largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization, sparking market excitement and discussions about its future potential. The surge in market capitalization and price is believed to be related to increasing institutional interest, deepening strategic partnerships, and its role in the crypto ecosystem. Additionally, XRP's integration into multiple financial systems and its potential as a macro asset class are also seen as key factors driving the current market sentiment.
DYDX: Today's discussions about DYDX mainly focused on the dYdX Yapper Leaderboard launched by KaitoAI. The leaderboard aims to identify the most active community participants, with a total of $150,000 in rewards to be distributed over the first three seasons. This initiative has sparked broad community participation, with many users discussing the potential rewards and the incentive effect on the DYDX ecosystem. Meanwhile, progress on the ethDYDX to dYdX native chain migration and historical airdrop events have also been topics of discussion.
1. "What Is 'ICM'? Holding Up the $4 Billion Market Cap Solana's New Narrative"
Overnight, the hottest narrative in the crypto space has become "Internet Capital Markets," with a host of crypto projects and founders, led by the Solana ecosystem's new Launchpad platform Believe, releasing this phrase. Together with "Believe in something," it has become the new slogan heralding the onset of a bull market. What exactly is the so-called "Internet Capital Market," will it become a short-lived hype phrase like the Base ecosystem's previous Content Coin, and what related targets are available for selection?2.《LaunchCoin Surges 20x in One Day, How Did Believe Create a $200M Market Cap Shiba Inu After Going to Zero?|100x Retrospective》
LAUNCHCOIN broke through a $200 million market cap today, with the long-lost liquidity and such a high market cap "Memecoin" almost bringing half of the on-chain crypto community CT into the fray. The community is crazily discussing this token, with half of it being FOMO and the other half being FUD. This token, originally issued by Believe founder Ben Pasternak under his personal identity, transformed into a new platform token after a renaming. From once going to zero to a $200 million market cap, what happened in between?May 14 On-chain Fund Flow