How Will a16z's $30T AI Agent Dream Come True? The Answer Lies in "The AI Hunger Games"
Original Article Title: What's the point of Crypto AI Agents?
Original Article Author: 0xJeff, AI Investor
Original Article Translation: AididiaoJP, Foresight News
It has been a full year since the wave of AI Agents started in late 2024.
Back then, @virtuals_io was the first to propose the concept of "AI Agents Tokenization," pairing AI applications/tokens with fair-launch tokens.
In this short year, the Crypto AI field has undergone a transformative change: driving the open-source movement of general AI, with a plethora of tools emerging, making it easy for developers and novices alike to start building projects.
Initially just an AI product launch, undervalued fair launch, led by independent developers or small teams, it has now evolved into a full Crypto AI ecosystem, with hundreds of great teams building their vision here.
In light of the recent x402 narrative heat, this article will explore the most critical question through examining the industry's current state, understanding changes, and analyzing the progress of key players: where is all this heading? What is the core value of Crypto AI Agents?
If you, like me, are excited about AI and keen on learning, you may have noticed the rapid pace of AI development. There is something novel and cool every month. From "nice to have" basic applications like transforming everything into a Studio Ghibli style, to AI-generated videos of production quality, to AI Agents that are more productive than the average junior developer.
However, in the Crypto field, things are not always as straightforward. Last year at this time when the AI Agents narrative was taking off, the hot projects were these:
· @truth_terminal came to life, interacted with a16z's @pmarca, and secured investment.
· @aixbt_agent provided insightful analysis and is also a quirky, native Crypto community player on the X platform.
· @virtuals_io, as part of the "Agent society," saw its "Agent token" skyrocket 10-50 times regularly.
· @dolos_diary is the Internet's top "bully," beloved for their sharp and witty humor.
· @luna_virtuals as the first AI idol.
Entertainment was the primary theme when narratives started, but it's been a long time since we've seen AI Agents bring any new form of entertainment (which might be a good thing, but the charm and allure of the early AI era have faded).
The focus is now heavily on the vertical where Crypto itself excels: financial use cases, i.e., making money (and not losing it).
a16z, in its latest "Crypto Industry Landscape" report, proposed a potential $30 trillion market size for the Metaverse economy, which might be a bit unrealistic since the entire AI market is projected to be only a few trillion dollars by 2030.
That being said, I believe the entire Metaverse economy indeed has the potential to be worth tens of trillions of dollars. With generative AI tools and vertical AI aiding individuals in productivity, increased enterprise adoption, and more efficient AI-driven workflows introduced and implemented within organizations, this market will continue to expand.
The Crypto space is no exception. However, as this industry is heavily focused on making money, its workflows naturally revolve around wealth creation. Several key categories stand out:
DeFi: The Most Mature Product-Market Fit in Crypto
· Trading (spot, perpetual contracts, on CEX/DEX)
· Money Markets (lending, crypto asset collateralization)
· Stablecoins (exchange medium/value store, composable high-yield DeFi strategies)
· Yield Protocols (interest rate markets, liquidity mining, funding rate markets, yield optimizers/treasury products)
· RWA/DePIN (bringing real-world productive assets on-chain, connecting on-chain capital to off-chain demand)
This is the largest potential market with a total locked value exceeding $150 billion and a stablecoin market cap surpassing $300 billion. Increasing regulatory clarity and institutional adoption are driving more capital on-chain; while the surge in stablecoin adoption is also attracting more enterprises and startups to use crypto-native channels.
For these reasons, the demand for automation as backend infrastructure and tools, with enterprises/startups as the frontend bringing mainstream users on-chain, will be crucial in driving the next stage of adoption.
AI agents that can abstract away DeFi complexity, streamline execution processes, or improve key DeFi aspects such as risk management, asset rebalancing, and strategy curation are likely to capture a significant portion of the inflowing value into DeFi protocols.
Key Ecosystem Players:
@almanak, @gizatechxyz, @Cod3xOrg, @TheoriqAI, @ZyfAI_
· DeAI represents the most mature product-market fit in the Crypto AI space
· Prediction Markets x AI: The fastest-growing subsegment in the Crypto space
If you continue to observe the ecosystem, you will notice minimal changes in the DeFi x AI space. This is because cracking the workflows related to DeFi is extremely challenging. You can't just plug AI in and hope for the best; responsible structural design and safeguards must be implemented to prevent major incidents.
Why am I talking about these now, rather than the generic 'AI Agent'?
The initial AI Agent ecosystem was essentially Virtuals and the agents built within its ecosystem (possibly sporadic ones like CreatorBid), as well as frameworks like ai16z (now called ElizaOS) that made it easy to build 'agents' or X robots that could call on a variety of tools, along with many other frameworks like Arc, Pippin, and more.
While these things are cool and interesting, this is not the true definition of an AI agent. A true agent should be able to understand its environment, comprehend its role and responsibilities, make proactive decisions, and take actions to achieve specific goals with minimal human intervention.
If you look around, over 95% of projects are not like that. They are either just software, a generative AI product, or still in the process of evolving towards autonomous AI agents.
I'm not trying to belittle anyone. What I'm trying to emphasize is that we are still * very early, to the point where most people haven't really figured out what works.
Those who have figured out what works are usually not classified as 'AI agents' but rather seen as an AI project.
Ecosystem Status
The recent buzz brought by x402 has stimulated capital rotation and interest in Crypto AI, but the new ecosystem landscape is vastly different from before.
1. Framework Hype Has Subsided
Frameworks used to be very crucial as they helped builders get up to speed quickly, reducing time spent on learning and coding, designing workflows. Tools like MCP have enhanced the ability for smart agents to call or provide APIs, ERC-8004 has been instrumental in the establishment of registries and solidifying Ethereum as a trust and settlement layer, Google's A2A & AP2 are becoming the preferred frameworks for builders, and AI agents/workflow-building tools like n8n have also attracted a large number of developers and regular users.
Because of this, the hype around "frameworks" themselves has cooled down, with many projects shifting focus elsewhere. For example, @arcdotfun has shifted towards a workflow builder; @openservai, initially positioned as "clusters," has now also turned towards a workflow builder, as well as tools aimed at leveraging agents to create Web3 AI-driven businesses and targeting specific user groups (such as predictive market workflows).
Frameworks are still important, but with the proliferation of Web2 AI frameworks and tools, and the adoption of Web3 channels, the hype around Web3 frameworks has waned.
2. Transition from Fair Launch Pad to ICO Model
The fair launch pad model was beneficial for small retail investors but made it difficult for teams to scale. It also easily became a breeding ground for independent developers to engage in short-term builds or purely hype, rather than creating a sustainable long-term AI business that can last for 3-5 years.
In this regard, it makes sense for Virtuals to expand through its Smart Agent Business Protocol. As x402 solidifies itself as a smart agent payment channel, establishes the infrastructure for smart agent trust/reputation scoring, and defines how smart agents collaborate and pay each other for services, it is crucial to realizing the smart agent vision.
However, challenges and core issues remain: "Is there a demand for high-quality services that people are willing to pay for?"
If most services are useless, why wouldn't people just use Web2 AI services directly instead of opting for Web3? What is the point of aggregating Web3 smart agents if that's the case?
To build a sustainable AI business generating 7-8 figure revenue, you need funding, highly energetic talent, and time to build the vision, something the fair launch pad model struggles to meet.
Conversely, we are seeing an increasing popularity of medium to large AI teams, which are able to secure seed funding from angel investors and VCs and enter the market through a community round (whether on Kaito Launchpad, Legion, or Echo).
These teams, leveraging their resources (funding, talent, VC endorsements, etc.), often deliver much higher-quality products/services, which typically also result in better token performance.
3. Dysfunctional Revenue Models and Tokenomics
Managing both an AI product and a token requires two completely different sets of skills that need to be carefully designed to combine the two to accelerate product growth and user acquisition (e.g., airdropping tokens to the right users → users converting to paying users → using the product with payment → earning more tokens, which bind users to the project long-term through mechanisms like revenue sharing, buybacks, governance, etc. → sustaining the flywheel).
It's easier said than done. Most small AI agent teams allocate 30-80% of their tokenomics, leaving no resources left to kickstart any growth flywheels.
Most projects adopt a SaaS subscription model or usage-based/point billing and add the option to pay using tokens for discounts. Many projects will use a portion of subscription revenue to buy back tokens or burn tokens used to pay for services.
Using subscription revenue to buy back tokens is fine, but mandating token-only payment (or offering only discounts) makes it challenging to scale.
Cryptocurrency tokens are highly volatile. Using them as a payment medium is not a good idea (it could rise by 20% today and drop by 30% tomorrow, making budgeting difficult).
4. Darwinian AI: A New Path to Capital Formation and Clear Tokenomics
@opentensor (Bittensor) has become the preferred platform for founders to bootstrap ideas, miners to contribute to AI, and investors to invest in the next potentially industry-disrupting DeAI company.
@flock_io is setting standards for privacy-preserving and domain-specific AI using federated learning, attracting Web2 enterprises, government clients, and trainers (miners) looking to contribute to AI. Similar to Bittensor, Flock helps companies accomplish cool and meaningful AI work by leveraging external top-tier talent.
@BitRobotNetwork, inspired by Bittensor, is taking a similar approach to guide a robot-centric subnet ecosystem.
At the same time, real-world benchmarks/evaluations with real funds gaming are also emerging (which has also become a form of high-quality entertainment):
· @the_nof1's Alpha Arena allows 6 cutting-edge AI models to engage in perpetual contract trading competition with real money (each with $10,000).
· @FractionAI_xyz leverages competition among AI agents to improve/continuously fine-tune agents to provide better outputs, signals, profits, and risk management.
· @openservai created OpenArena, where AI models compete in prediction market trading.
Darwinian AI is addressing the issue of capital formation and is the engine driving Crypto AI innovation.
· The top-ranked Bittensor subnet Chutes is already the top-ranked Inference Service Provider on OpenRouter, which is the most popular universal API gateway among global AI developers.
· Top-tier compute subnets (3-4) collectively have annual recurring revenues of $20-30 million.
· Prediction-related subnets are starting to generate annual recurring revenues in the hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars by monetizing alpha signals and/or utilizing signals for better trading/prediction.
Darwinian Competitive AI = Capital Formation (no need for venture capital) + Innovation Acceleration (attracting AI/ML engineers to contribute) = This will be the core force driving the AI agent narrative in 2026.
Note: "Darwinian AI" refers to a decentralized ecosystem that drives AI model development, evaluation, and rewards based on competition and market economics. Its core idea is "survival of the fittest," just like Darwin's theory of natural selection, allowing the most excellent and useful AI models to win in open competition and receive rewards.
So, what's exciting for small teams or AI agents now?
To be honest, there are some I'm using well, but currently, there isn't one that I'm willing to pay for.
· Research: Grok covers the X platform, ChatGPT covers the general domain.
· Deep Analysis: I mainly look at newsletters and Messari reports.
· Quick Market Outlook: Use the @elfa_ai TG chatbot.
· Market Trading Signal: Use @AskBillyBets, @Polysights, and @aion5100's @futuredotfun. (Excited for @sire_agent's aVault, but not yet public.)
· DeFi: Mostly self-operated, occasionally use @almanak and @gizatechxyz, although these are not strictly considered "AI agents" and are not part of a fair launch.
· Trading: Use @DefiLlama for swaps on EVM or @JupiterExchange for swaps on Solana. Avoid perpetual contracts (use @Cod3xOrg for analysis and execution when needed).
The Crypto space is accustomed to providing users with free access to everything, so users prefer free tools. Token gating or paywalling has proven ineffective, but seamlessly integrating fees into the product is viable. That's why outcome-based pricing models are very effective. People are not willing to pay $40 per month, but they are willing to pay a $40 Gas fee for a successful transaction.
If you can deliver the best outcome (high yield, best trade price), as long as the result is good enough, no one will mind you embedding fees.
After trying out so many Crypto AI apps or agents, what I've learned is that the best products currently are the ones that make money, with the best vertical being Launchpads (along with the upcoming prediction markets), i.e., running an on-chain "casino" and collecting fees from trades.
Future Outlook
· Real-world use cases that achieve mainstream adoption (ones that regular non-crypto AI developers or users would use) will emerge next year, most likely originating from the DeAI/Darwinian AI ecosystem.
· 2026 will be the year of Crypto AI, with a plethora of DeFi use cases, DeAI infrastructure, and prediction use cases emerging.
· Most small AI agent teams will gradually disappear or be acquired/merged, or pivot to building within the Darwinian AI ecosystem.
· Crypto AI and AI agents as a niche field will converge, marking a clearer product direction and vision for Crypto AI.
· The launchpad will still be at the core of the Crypto Twitter community, generating transaction volume and fees, but the significant innovation driving industry progress will occur in the most resource-rich (capital, talent, distribution channels, and user adoption) locations.
The Significance of Crypto AI Agents
For a fair-launched "AI agent," the significance lies in designing a trading experience disguised as "investment technology," although most of it is simply an LLM wrapper with a token layer.
In most cases, it provides the best path for retail investors to early invest in such "AI agents," speculate on assets, and make money.
The narrative of Crypto AI agents is significant in laying the groundwork for the future AI economy, where blockchain will serve as the core infrastructure/channel to make all of this possible.
You may also like

ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.

Morning Report | OpenAI has submitted an S-1 registration statement draft to the U.S. SEC; Morpho completes $175 million financing

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage

Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.

Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.

White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.

Bitcoin Trading Guide 2026: Strategies for Experienced Traders

What Is XAUT and PAXG? Why Tokenized Gold Is Booming in 2026

Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching

Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.

Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.

Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery

Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway
Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.

WEEX Deposit/Withdrawal Dynamic Island: Your Asset Status, Always in Sight

Scaling Crypto Derivatives: The Digital Asset Infrastructure Behind High-Volume Trading
In the fast-moving digital asset ecosystem, derivatives platforms face an extreme architectural test. High-leverage futures markets demand more than just standard security—they require absolute operational precision, zero-latency matching engines, and ironclad structural scalability, all while navigating intense market volatility.
As global platforms scale to meet these demands, the industry is shifting away from rigid, monolithic setups toward a more agile, "decoupled" infrastructure philosophy.
The Blueprint for High-Volume Copy TradingFor elite global exchanges like WEEX (founded in 2018), this architectural choice becomes critical when scaling high-volume retail features like social copy trading. When thousands of users automatically mirror the real-time strategies of elite traders simultaneously, it triggers sudden, monumental spikes in concurrent transactional volume.
To prevent execution latency or settlement bottlenecks during these peak volatility events, a platform's primary engine must remain entirely dedicated to risk management, copy-trade synchronization, and order matching.
The Architectural Rule: New-generation platforms must separate front-end user execution engines from heavy backend infrastructural overhead to eliminate operational friction.
By separating these layers, platforms can maintain complete sovereignty over their trading environments and user experiences while strategically aligning with institutional-grade infrastructure ecosystems. This strategic framework allows modern exchanges to leverage advanced Digital Asset Custody infrastructure such as Cobo’s behind the scenes, ensuring that backend wallet management scales elastically alongside trading spikes.
Capitalizing on Market Momentum and 400× LeverageIn a derivatives arena where platforms offer up to 400× leverage on perpetual contracts, capital efficiency and market agility are core business metrics. To capture market momentum, an exchange needs the ability to rapidly expand its asset offerings, supporting everything from legacy crypto assets to sudden, trending altcoins across a massive library of trading pairs.
Adopting a flexible, scalable Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) solution such as Cobo’s could completely rewrite the development timeline for high-growth exchanges. Instead of spending months of engineering capital building out custom backend wallet architectures for every new blockchain network, platforms can deploy localized infrastructure in days.
This agility allows platforms to instantly scale their listings to over a thousand trading pairs without compromising security or delaying time-to-market. It mirrors the exact operational advantages seen during high-velocity market events, similar to how advanced wallet infrastructure empowers platforms during sudden asset surges; allowing exchanges to pass that speed and liquidity directly to their global user base.
A Mature Foundation for GrowthThe synergy between trusted infrastructure ecosystems and global trading platforms represents the natural evolution of a maturing crypto market. As WEEX continues to scale its global spot and derivatives offerings for over 6 million users, adopting robust backend paradigms proves that platforms no longer have to compromise between cutting-edge trading velocity and uncompromised structural security.
ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.

