Deep Dive into BTC On-chain Analysis: Where is the Short-Term Bottom?
Original Author: Murphy, On-chain Data Analyst
Chip Structure Determines the Lower Limit of BTC Price Pullback
Every event that drives market sentiment change is accompanied by a sudden surge in on-chain transaction volume. After data filtering to exclude transfers within the same entity address cluster, the daily on-chain actual transaction volume is usually around 100k BTC (7-day average), with more on weekdays and less on weekends; if it exceeds 150k BTC, it is considered an "abnormal" data point.
For example, the Luna flash crash in May 2022, the FTX flash crash in November 2022, and the collapse of U.S. banks such as Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank from March to April 2023 all brought extreme panic and anxiety to the market, with on-chain transaction volume peaking at over 300k BTC (see Figure 1).

(Figure 1)
From this perspective, we should no longer doubt whether on-chain data can truly reflect "transaction" behavior. It can even be considered that BTC's on-chain settlement is the barometer of the entire crypto market's activity level and a quantified form of macro sentiment.
We can see that after November, as Trump won the presidential election, market sentiment reached a climax, with daily settlement volume reaching 200k. In this round of the cycle, a similar level was only seen in March of this year, indicating a large influx of capital in the short term. However, after December 17, the sentiment began to noticeably cool down, with the average daily settlement volume dropping to around 120k by the 25th. Historically, after experiencing a peak period, the ebb of activity also means that the market enters a period of calm, which is also the most vulnerable time for a pullback to occur.

By tracking UTXOs and differentiating on-chain transactions based on different realized prices, we can derive a highly intuitive set of chip structure distribution data, known as URPD (see Figure 2).

(Figure 2)
From the current data, the on-chain structure is gradually forming a chip accumulation zone in the $92,000 to $100,000 range, with a massive 600k BTC volume column at $97,000 as the peak, decreasing on both sides.
The Appearance of a Massive Volume Candle Indicates 2 Points:
1. The high likelihood that this is not the absolute top price of the bull market cycle.
2. The price range has experienced intense long and short positioning battles, with a large amount of turnover leading to chip stacking.
Where there are sellers, there are buyers. This indicates that some people here believe the price will continue to drop and want to hedge, while others believe the price at this level presents a good buying opportunity. It is precisely because of the significant buying behavior that the $92,000 to $100,000 range has established a strong support effect. This is why we say that the chip stacking zone has a "damping effect" on the price, meaning that the price will face resistance when trying to break through (difficult to penetrate), and there will be gravitational forces pulling the price back when it moves away.
If it is a major cycle top, there usually won't be much dissent, only "consensus." When the majority of participants reach a consensus that the price is "too high," naturally, there will be more selling than buying, and the market will naturally "peak." Therefore, dissent is not necessarily a bad thing; it is a necessary process for the market to self-correct.
If we must provide an example, a similar chip structure also emerged in July-August 2024 (as shown in Figure 3).

(Figure 3)
At that time, a chip stacking zone was formed in the $64,000 to $69,000 range, with a massive volume candle of 52k BTC created at $67,000 as the peak, gradually decreasing towards both sides, forming a regional price support. I believe everyone still remembers that for a long time after this, the price of BTC did not fall below this price range. Even when it started moving away from this range on August 5 and September 7, the chip structure in this range remained intact. After some time, the price of BTC will return to this range (experiencing gravitational pull).
If we compare the current structure with the horizontal structure in July, the patterns are very similar, but the current one is not as robust yet. Nevertheless, it has already shown a clear support role. Over time, as the turnover becomes more extensive here, the support effect will be stronger. Of course, if the price continues to break upwards, unless it surges quickly away from this price range, it will also be constrained by "gravity" (short-term high-level chips will create massive selling pressure).
We can also observe similar conclusions from CBD data from another perspective (as shown in Figure 4).

(Figure 4)
Unlike the URPD, which tracks the analysis of the original UTXO, the CBD (BTC Cost Basis Distribution) conducts data calculations per address. It better represents the overall behavior of network participants and can clearly display the trend of cost basis changes over time.
From Figure 4, we can see that as the BTC price retraced to below $100,000 on 12/8, the color changed from green to red, indicating an increase in the money supply (see Point 2). This suggests that a significant amount of bottom-fishing behavior occurred at that time. The chips bought during this period did not show a significant decrease even after the rebound on 12/16 and the subsequent fall on 12/23, with the cost basis remaining around $97,000-$100,000, forming effective support.
Additionally, the chips bought at the low point of $96,000 during the retracement on 12/10 were sold when the price rebounded to $105,000 on 12/16, causing the color to change from red to green (see Point 1). However, when the price retraced again to around $96,000 on 12/21, funds started to buy in. This group is likely engaged in short-term swing trading and represents the main group of on-chain turnover in recent days (STH).
The remaining chips trapped at high prices between $100,000 and $102,000 also account for a significant portion, but they are relatively firm in their positions. Currently, there is no significant decrease in their numbers.
In conclusion, the current market sentiment is gradually calming down, and liquidity is decreasing. However, the chip structure remains "healthy," with the price support formed in the $92,000-$100,000 range proving to be effective. As time passes and turnover increases, the support will strengthen (determining the lower limit). Whether we can see a new all-time high or reverse the trend decline will depend on the market's expectations of macro policies after entering January of the 25th year.
This content is for communication and research purposes only and should not be considered investment advice.
You may also like

Stolen: $290 million, Three Parties Refusing to Acknowledge, Who Should Foot the Bill for the KelpDAO Incident Resolution?

ASTEROID Pumped 10,000x in Three Days, Is Meme Season Back on Ethereum?

ChainCatcher Hong Kong Themed Forum Highlights: Decoding the Growth Engine Under the Integration of Crypto Assets and Smart Economy

Why can this institution still grow by 150% when the scale of leading crypto VCs has shrunk significantly?

Anthropic's $1 trillion, compared to DeepSeek's $100 billion

Geopolitical Risk Persists, Is Bitcoin Becoming a Key Barometer?

Annualized 11.5%, Wall Street Buzzing: Is MicroStrategy's STRC Bitcoin's Savior or Destroyer?

An Obscure Open Source AI Tool Alerted on Kelp DAO's $292 million Bug 12 Days Ago

Mixin has launched USTD-margined perpetual contracts, bringing derivative trading into the chat scene.
The privacy-focused crypto wallet Mixin announced today the launch of its U-based perpetual contract (a derivative priced in USDT). Unlike traditional exchanges, Mixin has taken a new approach by "liberating" derivative trading from isolated matching engines and embedding it into the instant messaging environment.
Users can directly open positions within the app with leverage of up to 200x, while sharing positions, discussing strategies, and copy trading within private communities. Trading, social interaction, and asset management are integrated into the same interface.
Based on its non-custodial architecture, Mixin has eliminated friction from the traditional onboarding process, allowing users to participate in perpetual contract trading without identity verification.
The trading process has been streamlined into five steps:
· Choose the trading asset
· Select long or short
· Input position size and leverage
· Confirm order details
· Confirm and open the position
The interface provides real-time visualization of price, position, and profit and loss (PnL), allowing users to complete trades without switching between multiple modules.
Mixin has directly integrated social features into the derivative trading environment. Users can create private trading communities and interact around real-time positions:
· End-to-end encrypted private groups supporting up to 1024 members
· End-to-end encrypted voice communication
· One-click position sharing
· One-click trade copying
On the execution side, Mixin aggregates liquidity from multiple sources and accesses decentralized protocol and external market liquidity through a unified trading interface.
By combining social interaction with trade execution, Mixin enables users to collaborate, share, and execute trading strategies instantly within the same environment.
Mixin has also introduced a referral incentive system based on trading behavior:
· Users can join with an invite code
· Up to 60% of trading fees as referral rewards
· Incentive mechanism designed for long-term, sustainable earnings
This model aims to drive user-driven network expansion and organic growth.
Mixin's derivative transactions are built on top of its existing self-custody wallet infrastructure, with core features including:
· Separation of transaction account and asset storage
· User full control over assets
· Platform does not custody user funds
· Built-in privacy mechanisms to reduce data exposure
The system aims to strike a balance between transaction efficiency, asset security, and privacy protection.
Against the background of perpetual contracts becoming a mainstream trading tool, Mixin is exploring a different development direction by lowering barriers, enhancing social and privacy attributes.
The platform does not only view transactions as execution actions but positions them as a networked activity: transactions have social attributes, strategies can be shared, and relationships between individuals also become part of the financial system.
Mixin's design is based on a user-initiated, user-controlled model. The platform neither custodies assets nor executes transactions on behalf of users.
This model aligns with a statement issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on April 13, 2026, titled "Staff Statement on Whether Partial User Interface Used in Preparing Cryptocurrency Securities Transactions May Require Broker-Dealer Registration."
The statement indicates that, under the premise where transactions are entirely initiated and controlled by users, non-custodial service providers that offer neutral interfaces may not need to register as broker-dealers or exchanges.
Mixin is a decentralized, self-custodial privacy wallet designed to provide secure and efficient digital asset management services.
Its core capabilities include:
· Aggregation: integrating multi-chain assets and routing between different transaction paths to simplify user operations
· High liquidity access: connecting to various liquidity sources, including decentralized protocols and external markets
· Decentralization: achieving full user control over assets without relying on custodial intermediaries
· Privacy protection: safeguarding assets and data through MPC, CryptoNote, and end-to-end encrypted communication
Mixin has been in operation for over 8 years, supporting over 40 blockchains and more than 10,000 assets, with a global user base exceeding 10 million and an on-chain self-custodied asset scale of over $1 billion.

$600 million stolen in 20 days, ushering in the era of AI hackers in the crypto world

Vitalik's 2026 Hong Kong Web3 Summit Speech: Ethereum's Ultimate Vision as the "World Computer" and Future Roadmap

On the same day Aave introduced rsETH, why did Spark decide to exit?

Full Post-Mortem of the KelpDAO Incident: Why Did Aave, Which Was Not Compromised, End Up in Crisis Situation?

After a $290 million DeFi liquidation, is the security promise still there?

ZachXBT's post ignites RAVE nearing zero, what is the truth behind the insider control?

Vitalik 2026 Hong Kong Web3 Carnival Speech Transcript: We do not compete on speed; security and decentralization are the core

In-depth Analysis of RAVE Events: Short Squeeze, Crash, and Quantitative Financial Models of Liquidity Manipulation


