「10U War God」 Collective Charge, Betting on Trump's Law-Breaking 'Unsealed' Epstein Files
BlockBeats News, December 8th: The prediction market on Polymarket regarding "Will Trump release Epstein files by December 19th/31st?" is currently in a tug-of-war between legal clarity and market cautious expectations. Trump signed the Epstein Transparency Act on November 19th, which explicitly requires the Department of Justice (DOJ) to release all unclassified documents within 30 days of the signing. This means the statutory deadline for document release is December 19th.
However, despite the legal requirement for the documents to be released by the 19th of this month, the probability of "release on December 19th" is currently only hovering around 56%, and the probability of "release by December 31st" is only 70%. This uncertainty is mainly due to the stringent settlement rules of this market: the ruling requires the documents to be proactively released by the executive branch through official websites, press releases, etc., and must contain substantive content regarding Jeffrey Epstein's illegal activities. Unsealing by federal courts, release by Congress, or metadata without substantive content do not meet the requirements.
The market is generally concerned that while the DOJ must comply with the act, it must also edit portions of the documents that involve victim and personal identity information. This is a time-consuming process and may lead to legal disputes, and any challenge to the editing scope could result in the documents not being made public within the statutory deadline in a manner compliant with settlement rules, leading to a settlement of "no" in the market.
In this environment full of uncertainty, three traders holding "No" shares are particularly noteworthy, and their trading styles indicate a strong belief:
0xtherealbatman holds $4,000 worth of 19th "No" at an average price of 44c, with a historical average position size of less than $10.
ohawaffle holds $4,900 worth of 19th "No" at an average price of 43c, with a historical average position size of $60.
VT2025 holds nearly $2,000 worth of 31st "No" at an average price of 26c, with a historical average position size of $50.
All three traders have a position concentration of over 90% and are heavily betting that the documents will not be released within 2025 or that the released documents will not meet the settlement rules of the market.
You may also like

The AI gamble of mining companies: Valuations enter a phase of differentiation, and it's hard to turn the tide

A letter from Alliance to entrepreneurs: Written on the occasion of Cursor selling for 60 billion dollars

Will MicroStrategy fall into a death spiral? What will the macro trend be in the second half of the year?

Blockchain Capital Partner: The Core Secret of Arbitrage

STRC unanchored by 11%, can the perpetual motion machine of Strategy still operate?

Bitcoin Market Analysis 2026: Can BTC Reach $150K by Year-End?

Bitcoin ETF Outflows Hit a Record $4.4 Billion: What Are Traders Doing With Their Cash?

WEEX App Just Got Smarter – New Tabs for Faster Trades & Easy Asset Management

WEEX All-New Search Features: Find, Trade & Earn Faster Than Ever

Morning Report | Illinois signs the strictest digital asset tax law in the U.S.; RWA tokenization market size surpasses $43 billion, institutions accelerate the migration of on-chain assets

Full version of the debut Q&A! Federal Reserve Chairman Waller: Sticking to the 2% inflation target, establishing five special working groups, individual did not submit the dot plot

From Disruptor to Shadow Market: The Crypto Market is Becoming a Colony of Traditional Finance

Dalio's important long article: How to position in the current market environment?

OKX Star analyzes Binance's competitive advantages: when regulation levels the playing field, competition has just begun

New gameplay for participating in initial offerings on cryptocurrency exchanges

Why Is Bitcoin Down Today? What the Hawkish FOMC Means for SpaceX, Gold and Nasdaq

DeepSeek Financing Story

