Trump Urged by Crypto Groups to Intervene in Roman Storm Retrial
Key Takeaways
- Over 65 cryptocurrency and blockchain advocacy groups have called on former President Donald Trump to assist in Roman Storm’s retrial involving Tornado Cash.
- Roman Storm faces legal challenges after being convicted of operating an unlicensed money transmitting business.
- Heavy emphasis is placed on the argument that “writing code is not a crime,” which resonates broadly within the tech and crypto communities.
- The broader implications of this case reflect on the ongoing debate around regulatory clarity and innovation in crypto technologies.
Advocacy Groups Rally Behind Roman Storm
In an unexpected plea to a former president, a coalition of over 65 cryptocurrency and blockchain companies, along with advocacy groups, has sought the intervention of Donald Trump in what is becoming a critical retrial for Roman Storm, co-founder of Tornado Cash. The call to action was conveyed through a letter that not only advocated for Storm but also highlighted key policy recommendations concerning the broader crypto ecosystem in the United States.
The advocacy bodies, which include organizations such as the Solana Policy Institute, Blockchain Association, and DeFi Education Fund, used this platform to address broader issues intertwining with Storm’s case. They urged Trump to direct relevant financial authorities—the IRS and US Treasury—to devise more coherent tax policies on digital assets. They also stressed the importance of protecting decentralized finance (DeFi) from excessive regulatory intervention and called for clearer guidance on digital asset governance from financial regulators like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).
Roman Storm’s Legal Battle
Roman Storm’s legal predicament has become a touchstone for debates around software development and regulatory policy. Already found guilty of running an unlicensed money transmitting business, Storm now faces a potential retrial on two other charges lingering from his original conviction. Despite his conviction, the jury did not reach a consensus on whether Storm participated in conspiracies involving money laundering and sanctions evasion.
A significant aspect of Storm’s defense—one that has piqued the interest of his supporters and advocacy groups—is the notion that writing and publishing open-source software does not constitute a financial crime. Storm and his advocates argue that the work involving Tornado Cash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency mixer, falls under freedom of expression, aligning with the First Amendment.
Furthermore, internal comments from the Department of Justice (DOJ) have added layers to the narrative. At a cryptocurrency summit, Matthew Galeotti from the DOJ’s criminal division acknowledged that simply writing code, without malicious intent, should not be deemed criminal behavior. Despite this, the DOJ continues to oppose Storm’s motions for acquittal, indicating ongoing tension and uncertainty about the interpretation and enforcement of laws surrounding digital currencies.
The Implications for Crypto Regulation
The Roman Storm case echoes broader concerns within the crypto industry about the regulatory environment in the U.S., which many argue remains ambiguous and fragmented. This ambiguity, advocates say, stymies innovation and dissuades developers and entrepreneurs who fear undefined legal repercussions.
Crypto advocacy groups are leveraging Storm’s case to push for more well-defined and crypto-friendly regulation, reinforcing the idea that innovation in blockchain and decentralized technologies should not be stifled by outdated or unclear laws. By positioning Storm’s software development as an innocuous act of publication, they hope to set a precedent that safeguards technological creativity and protects developers under free speech doctrines.
This incident also illuminates how judicial outcomes might influence policy directions at the federal level. Although a president has limited direct control over prosecutorial independence, their administration’s stance can sway the broader regulatory climate and priorities of federal agencies.
Calls for Presidential Influence
While the separation of powers and prosecutorial independence remain paramount in democratic governance, the advocacy groups appeal to Trump, not necessarily for direct intervention but rather for wielding influence to encourage a reconsideration of the charges against Storm. They argue that dismissing the charges would reaffirm the U.S. as a bastion of innovation, freedom, and technological progress.
As the crypto sector eagerly watches the unfolding of Storm’s legal journey, the community remains hopeful for outcomes that support the development and proliferation of blockchain technologies without overbearing legal constraints. This case serves as a potential pivot point in how digital asset regulations could evolve, highlighting both the pitfalls and possibilities against a backdrop of legal ambiguity.
FAQ
What is the Roman Storm case about?
Roman Storm is a co-founder of Tornado Cash, and he was convicted for running an unlicensed money transmitting business. He faces potential retrials on related charges, with advocacy groups rallying to highlight this as a freedom of speech issue relating to open-source software publication.
Why are crypto advocacy groups asking Trump to intervene?
The groups believe that the charges against Storm threaten the principle that “writing code is not a crime.” They seek Trump’s influence to promote policies that support regulatory clarity and protect innovation in the cryptocurrency sphere.
What is Tornado Cash?
Tornado Cash is a privacy-focused tool designed to provide anonymity in cryptocurrency transactions by obscuring transaction trails. It operates in the realm of open-source software but has faced scrutiny from regulators.
How might this case impact future cryptocurrency regulations?
If influenced to set a new precedent, Storm’s case could encourage greater regulatory clarity and leniency, potentially reshaping how crypto technologies and their developers are treated under U.S. law.
Is writing code considered a crime under current U.S. law?
Presently, writing code in itself is not a crime. However, when the code is part of a service that allegedly violates legal regulations, such as those covering money transmission and sanctions, it could become subject to legal action, as in the case with Storm.
You may also like

The opening price is expected to drop by 75%, perhaps the first project to be rug pulled this year.

Key Market Intelligence on January 19th, how much did you miss out on?

Trump Targets Fed and Italy’s Caution to Fin-Fluencers: A Comprehensive View
Key Takeaways: President Trump initiates a criminal probe against the Federal Reserve Chairman, questioning alleged resource mismanagement. Coinbase…

Crypto’s Decentralization Promise Falters at Interoperability
Interoperability in crypto exposes a decentralization gap, highlighting the reliance on centralized intermediaries. Users’ understanding of technical infrastructure…

Vitalik Advocates for Ethereum’s Simplified Future with ‘Garbage Collection’
Key Takeaways Vitalik Buterin stresses the need for a ‘garbage collection’ process to reduce Ethereum protocol complexity. The…

US Crypto Market Structure Bill in Limbo as Industry Reconsiders Support
Key Takeaways The US crypto market structure bill faces delays due to ongoing disputes among lawmakers and industry…

Trump Targets Fed, Italy Cautions Influencers: Global Financial Pulse
Key Takeaways: The United States is witnessing a political storm as former President Trump initiates criminal proceedings against…

The CLARITY Act’s Delay Could Benefit the Crypto Sector
Key Takeaways The stalling of the CLARITY Act is seen as beneficial for the crypto industry, as overregulation…

Discontent Among Trove Backers as Project Shifts from Hyperliquid to Solana
Key Takeaways Trove Markets, originally building on Hyperliquid, is facing backlash for its unexpected shift to Solana, leading…

The 80% Plunge in Gas Fees: Is It All Due to Miners Dumping?

Polymarket Exploit Arbitrage, Sonic Airdrop Accidentally Burned by Random Person, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?

Trump Reignites Tariff Storm, Cryptocurrency Market Faces Another 'Black Monday'

Delphi Digital's Top 10 Predictions for 2026: Perp DEX Eats Wall Street, AI Agents Usher in Era of Autonomous Trading

Layoffs of 30%, But Spending $250 Million to Buy a Company - What Is Polygon Thinking?

Cross-chain Collaboration: Tom Lee Invests $200 Million, Joins Forces with Global Top Streamer Mr. Beast

Interactive Brokers Integrates USDC, US Bank Questions Stablecoin, What's the Overseas Buzz?

The Genius Stopping Law: Why Did Coinbase Backpedal at the Eleventh Hour?

Rumor has it that Coinbase is set to acquire Farcaster, still an Acquihire.
The opening price is expected to drop by 75%, perhaps the first project to be rug pulled this year.
Key Market Intelligence on January 19th, how much did you miss out on?
Trump Targets Fed and Italy’s Caution to Fin-Fluencers: A Comprehensive View
Key Takeaways: President Trump initiates a criminal probe against the Federal Reserve Chairman, questioning alleged resource mismanagement. Coinbase…
Crypto’s Decentralization Promise Falters at Interoperability
Interoperability in crypto exposes a decentralization gap, highlighting the reliance on centralized intermediaries. Users’ understanding of technical infrastructure…
Vitalik Advocates for Ethereum’s Simplified Future with ‘Garbage Collection’
Key Takeaways Vitalik Buterin stresses the need for a ‘garbage collection’ process to reduce Ethereum protocol complexity. The…
US Crypto Market Structure Bill in Limbo as Industry Reconsiders Support
Key Takeaways The US crypto market structure bill faces delays due to ongoing disputes among lawmakers and industry…