Should I sell the Kaito airdrop, let's see what the community says?

By: blockbeats|2025/02/21 09:15:02
0
Share
copy

On February 20, Kaito Airdrop was officially launched, a AI-driven crypto project backed by top VCs with a valuation of up to 17 billion USD, sparking widespread global community attention. As a representative of the "Yap-to-Earn" model, Kaito rewards users through social media interactions, aiming to take the InfoFi concept to new heights.

According to the information released by Kaito, the core mechanism of this airdrop revolves around "Yap Points." Tokenomics show that 10% of the tokens are initially allocated to the community (56.67% of the total supply is planned for community and ecosystem, 19.5% for long-term incentives), with the rest allocated to the team (35%) and early investors (8.3%). The officials emphasize support for long-term holders and incentivize users through the "HODLer badge" and Genesis NFT bonuses.

After the launch of KAITO, the market performance remained relatively stable. According to market data, compared to some airdrop projects that experienced over 50% price drops on the first day, Kaito's airdrop saw price fluctuations of around 30% on the same day.

Should I sell the Kaito airdrop, let's see what the community says?

However, the community's views on the Kaito airdrop are divided, with both appreciation for the project's generosity and potential, as well as strong dissatisfaction with the expected gap and distribution rules. Based on user feedback on the X platform, BlockBeats summarized the positive and negative evaluations of the Kaito airdrop.

How Does the Community Perceive It?

For many users, the greatest appeal of the Kaito airdrop lies in its "high returns at zero cost" feature. X user @celiawan2 mentioned, "Most users received airdrops of 4-6 figures without spending a penny," making them feel that the Kaito team is more sincere. Especially for ordinary retail and mid-level users, rewards ranging from hundreds to thousands of dollars exceeded the expectations of many for a "zero-effort" project. Some even believe that "putting it into other projects would be praised as a team with courage." This view has gained some resonance in the community, especially among users who did not have high expectations for airdrops beforehand.

In addition, some users acknowledge Kaito's value, believing that Kaito has core value by optimizing information through AI. @BroLeonAus believes that, "As a protocol that is already generating revenue and has effectively changed the behavior of a part of the industry ecosystem, this is much more meaningful to me than most ghost chains that repeat the wheel." "Perhaps Kaito is not as good as everyone imagined before, but it should not be as bad as many people criticized tonight," tweeted @bee926cn, expressing optimism about Kaito's future and having already experienced its product, Kaito Pro.

On the other hand, there has also been a fair amount of negative feedback regarding the Kaito airdrop. The main focus of criticism has been on "expectation management" and "distribution rules."

Many users expressed that their expectations were inflated by community discussions prior to the airdrop. @Route2FI mentioned that they were expecting to receive between $50 to $120 in the airdrop, and although it was possible to quickly buy back, they ultimately sold the KAITO airdrop.

@Cary_Zz noted that there was a pre-circulated expectation that "each Yap point would be worth $100 or Genesis NFT holders would receive additional rewards." However, the actual result was that each Yap was worth around $21, with an overall 10% airdrop ratio, far below expectations, leaving the eagerly anticipating community greatly disappointed.

In response, @zijingNFT stated that the expectations for Kaito were overly hyped, with many participating KOLs engaging in social mining for yap, "but now the price of the coin is far from ideal, leading to inevitable FUD." @BroLeonAus shared a similar view, pointing out in a tweet that "more of the backlash comes from the expectation gap," a sentiment that almost pervades all negative comments and has become the focal point of community discussion.

Additionally, netizen @waleswoosh directly shared a meme expressing that the airdrop did not meet expectations. In the image, the skewered lamb chop represents the airdrop expectation, while the puree being fed into the mouth symbolizes reality.

Not only did the returns fall short of expectations, but the "values consideration" set by the project team in the distribution rules of this airdrop has also sparked discontent.

Firstly, Sonic Labs founder Andre Cronje posted on social media saying, "For reasons I will never understand, Coinbase has refused to list S for 8 years. And because I refuse to do anything on Base, I cannot claim the Kaito airdrop."

@hellosuoha pointed out that "consistency of values is a very interesting behavior, whether it is consistent or not, only oneself knows clearly. In the end, those who received a higher proportion are dissatisfied, and those who received less are even more dissatisfied, only those who received an airdrop immediately after registration are content." Furthermore, a netizen joked in the comments section: "How come I never thought that values could also be played with."

It is not just a values issue; the specific distribution ratio of the airdrop has also left the community dissatisfied.

@yuyue_chris posted, saying, "The differentiation in public opinion between top and mid-to-low-level KOLs is quite evident: most top KOLs are not very satisfied; the mid-to-low-level are very appreciative of $KAITO airdrop." @mdzzi also expressed a similar viewpoint, "The victory of mid-to-low-level KOLs; the influence of top-tier KOLs is being exploited," believing that there is a disproportionate return between top contributors and new users.

In response to this, some KOLs have shared their own data. @0xBreadguy mentioned, "It's a bit outrageous that I have to stake $120,000 worth of $KAITO to receive the same badge as someone staking $5 worth."

@0x0funky speculated, "The Yaps score does not scale linearly with the amount of Kaito received," noting that one Yaps point is around 7.5 Kaito, and many conversions of 20 points equate to giving 20 Kaito, "It seems like a basic income and then added based on the Yaps score."

@CyberPhilos speculated on the alignment of values between them and the Kaito team, combining it with a ratio, saying, "Those who flatter Kaito, yap: Kaito is 1:20 or even higher; those who are neutral, yap: Kaito is 1:10; those who have criticized Kaito in the past, yap: Kaito is 1:2."

Furthermore, the rapid selling by airdrop whales (on-chain data shows 7 out of the top 12 have liquidated their holdings) and the lack of a lock-up period have raised concerns in the community about the project falling into a "hype-pump-dump" short-term speculative cycle.

AI Data Tool Token Launch: How's the Performance?

While the community was engrossed in heated discussions about the Kaito airdrop, another AI data tool that had launched its token revealed on the 21st a KOL's received Kaito airdrop amount and the sell-off ratio analyzed by their in-house AI tool. This isn't the first time a data tool has launched a token. Previously, Binance had launched the Launchpad project Crypto data analysis platform Arkham (ARKM), which is also an on-chain data intelligence analysis platform. Arkham uses AI (Ultra Engine) to associate blockchain addresses with real-world entities, offering insights and analysis on transaction behavior.

Read more: "After Arkham, which data tools have yet to launch a token?"

Similar to Kaito, Arkham is also classified as an AI data tool, aiming to tackle the issue of fragmented information in the crypto world through technological means and provide users with "Alpha opportunities." The difference is, Kaito leans more towards social data, while Arkham focuses on on-chain data. So, how is the current situation of Arkham, the first data tool to launch a token? In terms of price, according to market data, $ARKM is currently priced at $0.71, with its all-time high price being $3.12 on March 10, 2024, indicating a price drop of nearly 80%, showing significant volatility. Perhaps due to being categorized under AI projects, its price fluctuates in line with the overall rise and fall of the AI sector.

In the current market environment where the AI sector is performing averagely, can Kaito's TVL after its coin issuance break the silence seen in various AI projects and bring back market enthusiasm? Or will it follow Arkham's old path, experiencing the ups and downs of the entire sector? Alternatively, will it engage in a competition for the ecological niche belonging to AI tools with Arkham? All of this leaves us awaiting eagerly.

You may also like

a16z Leads $18M Seed Round for Catena Labs, Crypto Industry Bets on Stablecoin AI Payment

Traditional finance is still stuck in a "human-to-human" model, while Catena aims to achieve "AI-to-AI" interaction.

Pharos, deeply integrated with AntChain, is about to launch. How can we get involved?

What is the relationship between the $8 million funded NewChain and Ant, and how will they interact?

$COIN Joins S&P 500, but Coinbase Isn't Celebrating

On May 13, S&P Dow Jones Indices announced that Coinbase would officially replace Discover Financial Services in the S&P 500 on May 19. While other companies like Block and MicroStrategy, closely tied to Bitcoin, were already part of the S&P 500, Coinbase became the first cryptocurrency exchange whose primary business is in the index. This also signifies that cryptocurrency is gradually moving from the fringes to the mainstream in the U.S.



On the day of the announcement, Coinbase's stock price surged by 23%, surpassing the $250 mark. However, just 3 days later, Coinbase was hit by two consecutive events: a hack where employees were bribed to steal customer data and a demand for a $20 million ransom, and an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into the authenticity of its claim of having over 100 million "verified users" in its securities filings and marketing materials. These two events acted as mini-bombs, and at the time of writing, Coinbase's stock had already dropped by over 7.3%.


Coincidentally, Discover Financial Services, being replaced by Coinbase, can also be considered the "Coinbase" of the previous payment era. Discover is a U.S.-based digital banking and payment services company headquartered in Illinois, founded in 1960. Its payment network, Discover Network, is the fourth largest payment network apart from Visa, Mastercard, and American Express.


In April, after the approval of the acquisition of Discover by the sixth-largest U.S. bank, Capital One, this well-established digital banking company of over 60 years smoothly handed over its S&P 500 "seat" to this emerging cryptocurrency "bank." This unexpected coincidence also portrayed the handover between the new and old eras in Coinbase's entry into the S&P 500, resembling a relay race scene. However, this relay baton also brought Coinbase's accumulated "external troubles and internal strife" to a tipping point.


Side Effects of ETFs


Over the past decade, cryptocurrency exchanges have been the most stable "profit machines." They play a role in providing liquidity to the entire industry and rely on trading fees to sustain their operations. However, with the comprehensive rollout of ETF products in the U.S. market, this profit model is facing unprecedented challenges. As the leader in the "American stack," with over 80% of its business coming from the U.S., Coinbase is most affected by this.



Starting from the approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, traditional financial capital has significantly onboarded users and funds that originally belonged to exchanges in a more cost-effective, compliant, and transparent manner. The transaction fee revenue of cryptocurrency exchanges has started to decline, and this trend may further intensify in the coming months.


According to Coinbase's 2024 Q4 financial report, the platform's total trading revenue was $417 million, a 45% year-on-year decrease. The contribution of BTC and ETH's trading revenue dropped from 65% in the same period last year to less than 50%.


This decline is not a result of a decrease in market enthusiasm. In fact, since the approval of the Bitcoin ETF in January 2024, the inflow of BTC into the U.S. market has continued to reach new highs, with asset management giants like BlackRock and Fidelity rapidly expanding their management scale. Data shows that BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) alone has surpassed $17 billion in assets under management. As of mid-May 2025, the cumulative net inflow of 11 major institutional Bitcoin spot ETFs on the market has exceeded $41.5 billion, with a total net asset value of $1214.69 billion, accounting for approximately 5.91% of the total Bitcoin market capitalization.


Chart showing the trend of net outflows for Grayscale among the 11 institutions


Institutional investors and some retail investors are shifting towards ETF products, partly due to compliance and tax considerations. On one hand, ETFs have much lower trading costs compared to cryptocurrency exchanges. While Coinbase's spot trading fee rate varies annually in a tiered manner but averages around 1.49%, for example, the management fee for IBIT ETF is only 0.25%, and the majority of ETF institution fees fluctuate around 0.15% to 0.25%.



In other words, the more rational users are, the more likely they are to move from exchanges to ETF products, especially for investors aiming for long-term holdings.


According to multiple sources, several institutions, including VanEck and Grayscale, have submitted applications to the SEC for a Solana (SOL) ETF, with some institutions also planning to submit an XRP ETF proposal. Once approved, this may trigger a new round of fund migration. According to a report submitted by Coinbase to the SEC, as of April, the platform's trading revenue from XRP and Solana accounted for 18% and 10%, nearly one-third of the platform's fee revenue.



However, the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs passed in 2024 also reduced the fees for these two tokens on Coinbase from 30% and 15% to 26% and 10%, respectively. If the SOL and XRP ETFs are approved, it will further undermine the core fee revenue of exchanges like Coinbase.


The expansion of ETF products is gradually weakening the financial intermediary status of cryptocurrency exchanges. From their original roles as matchmakers and clearers to now gradually becoming mere "on-ramps and off-ramps" for funds, exchanges are seeing their marginal value squeezed by ETFs.


Robinhood Takes a Stand, Traditional Brokerages Join the Fray


On May 12, 2025, SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins gave a keynote speech at the Tokenization and Cryptocurrency Working Group roundtable. The theme of his speech revolved around "It is a new day at the SEC," where he indicated that the SEC would not approach enforcement and regulation the same way as before but would instead pave the way for cryptocurrency assets in the U.S. market.



With signs of cryptocurrency compliance such as the SEC's "NEW DAY" declaration, an increasing number of traditional brokerages are attempting to enter the cryptocurrency industry. One of the most representative cases is the well-known U.S. brokerage Robinhood, which began expanding its crypto business in 2018. By the time of its IPO in 2021, Robinhood's crypto business revenue accounted for over 50% of the company, with a significant boost from the Dogecoin "moonshot" promoted by Musk.


In Q1 2025 earnings report, Robinhood showcased strong growth, especially in revenue from cryptocurrency and options trading. Fueled by Trump's Memecoin, cryptocurrency-related revenue reached $250 million, nearly doubling year-over-year. Consequently, Robinhood Gold subscription users reached 3.5 million, a 90% increase from the previous year, with the rapid growth of Robinhood Gold providing the company with a stable source of income.



Meanwhile, RobinHood is actively pursuing acquisitions in the cryptocurrency space. In 2024, it announced a $2 billion acquisition of the long-standing European cryptocurrency exchange Bitstamp. Additionally, Canada's largest cryptocurrency CEX, WonderFi, which recently went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange, also announced its integration with RobinHood Crypto. After obtaining virtual asset licenses in the UK, Canada, Singapore, and other markets, RobinHood has taken a proactive approach in the compliant cryptocurrency trading market.



Furthermore, an increasing number of brokerage firms are exploring the same path. Futu Securities, Tiger Brokers, and others are also dipping their toes into cryptocurrency trading, with some having applied for or obtained the VA license from the Hong Kong SFC. Although their user bases are currently small, traditional brokerages have a natural advantage in user trust, regulatory licenses, and low fee structures. This could pose a threat to native cryptocurrency platforms in the future.



User Data Breach: Is Coinbase Still Secure?


In April 2025, security researchers discovered that some Coinbase user data was leaked on the dark web. While the platform initially responded by attributing it to a "technical misinformation," it still raised concerns among users regarding its security and privacy protection. Just two days before Dow Jones Indexes announced Coinbase's addition to the S&P 500 Index, on May 11, 2025, Coinbase received an email from an unknown threat actor claiming to have obtained customer account information and internal documents, demanding a $20 million ransom to keep the data private. Subsequent investigations confirmed the data breach.


Cybercriminals obtained the data by bribing overseas customer service agents and support staff, mainly in "non-U.S. regions such as India." These agents abused their access to Coinbase's internal customer support system and stole customer data. As early as February this year, blockchain detective ZachXBT revealed on X platform that between December 2024 and January 2025, Coinbase users lost over $65 million to social engineering scams, with the actual amount potentially higher.


Among the victims was a well-known figure, 67-year-old Ed Suman, an established artist in the art world for nearly two decades, having been involved in the creation of artworks such as Jeff Koons' "Balloon Dog" sculpture. Earlier this year, he fell victim to an impersonation scam involving fake Coinbase customer support, resulting in a loss of over $2 million in cryptocurrency. ZachXBT critiqued Coinbase for its inadequate handling of such scams, noting that other major exchanges have not faced similar issues and recommending Coinbase to enhance its security measures.


Amidst a series of ongoing social engineering incidents, although there has not been any impact on user assets at the technical level so far, it has raised concerns among many retail and institutional investors. Especially institutions holding massive assets on Coinbase. Just considering the U.S. BTC ETF institutions, as of mid-May 2025, they collectively hold nearly 840,000 BTC, and 75% of these are custodied by Coinbase. If we price BTC at $100,000, this amount reaches a staggering $63 billion, which is equivalent to the nominal GDP of two Iceland in the year 2024.


Visualization: ChatGPT, Source: Farside


In addition, Coinbase Custody also serves over 300 institutional clients, including hedge funds, family offices, pension funds, and endowments. As of the Q1 2025 financial report, Coinbase's total assets under management (including institutional and retail clients) reached $404 billion. The specific amount of institutional custodied assets was not explicitly disclosed in the latest report, but it should still be over 50% based on the Q4 2024 report.


Visualization: ChatGPT


Once this security barrier is breached, not only could the rate of user attrition far exceed expectations, but more importantly, institutional trust in it would undermine the foundation of its business. Therefore, after a hacking event, Coinbase's stock price plummeted significantly.


CEXs are All in Self-Rescue Mode


Facing a decline in spot trading fee revenue, Coinbase is also accelerating its transformation, attempting to find growth opportunities in derivatives and emerging assets. Coinbase acquired a stake in the options platform Deribit at the end of 2024 and announced the official launch of perpetual contract products in 2025. This acquisition fills in Coinbase's gap in options trading and its relatively small global market share.



Deribit has a strong presence in non-U.S. markets, especially in Asia and Europe. The acquisition has enabled Coinbase to gain a dominant position in bitcoin and ethereum options trading on Deribit, accounting for approximately 80% of the global options trading volume, with daily trading volume remaining above $2 billion.


Meanwhile, 80-90% of Deribit's customer base consists of institutional investors, with their professionalism and liquidity in the Bitcoin and Ethereum options market highly favored by institutions. Coinbase's compliance advantage, coupled with its already robust institutional ecosystem, makes it even more suitable. By using institutions as an entry point, it can face the squeeze from giants like Binance and OKX in the derivatives market.



Facing a similar dilemma is Kraken, which is attempting to replicate Binance Futures' model in non-U.S. markets. Since the derivatives market relies more on professional users, fee rates are relatively higher and stickiness is stronger, making it a significant source of revenue for exchanges. In the first half of 2025, Kraken completed the acquisition of TradeStation Crypto and a futures exchange, aiming to build a complete derivatives trading ecosystem to hedge the risk of declining spot transaction fee income.


With the surge of Memecoin in 2024, Binance, OKX, and various CEX platforms began massively listing small-market-cap, highly volatile tokens to activate active trading users. Due to the wealth effect and trading activity of Memecoins, Coinbase was also forced to join the battle, successively listing popular tokens from the Solana ecosystem such as BOOK OF MEME and Dogwifhat. Although these coins are controversial, they are frequently traded, with fee rates several times higher than mainstream coins, serving as a "blood-boosting" method for spot trading.


However, due to its status as a publicly traded company, this practice is a riskier endeavor for Coinbase. Even in the current crypto-friendly environment, the SEC is still investigating whether tokens like SOL, ADA, and SAND constitute securities.


In addition to the forced transformation strategies carried out by the aforementioned CEXs, they are also starting to lay out RWAs and the most talked-about stablecoin payment fields, such as the PYUSD launched through a collaboration between Coinbase and Paypal, Coinbase's support for the Euro stablecoin EURC by Circle that complies with EU MiCA regulatory requirements, or the USD1 launched through a collaboration between Binance and WIFL. In the increasingly crowded trading field, many CEXs have shifted their focus from just the trading market to the application field.


The golden age of transaction fees has quietly ended, and the second half of the crypto exchange platform game has silently begun.


Key Market Insights for May 16th, how much did you miss out on?

1. On-chain Flows: $111.3M inflow to Ethereum this week; $237.6M outflow from Berachain 2. Largest Price Swings: $ETHFI, $NEIRO 3. Top News: Data: Solana Network's revenue reached $7.9M on the 13th, surpassing the sum of all other L1 and L2 chains

MOG Coin Skyrockets as Elon Musk and Garry Tan Embrace "mog/acc" Identity

「mog/acc」 is rapidly sweeping through various figures, from Elon Musk to Garry Tan, boosting the project's visibility and ultimately driving up the price.

The End and Rebirth of NFTs: How the Meme Coin Craze Ended the PFP Era?

There must be another Labubu hidden beneath the ruins.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more