Base Builder Talk: How a China-based Developer Endorsed by Base is Going All-In on the On-Chain Economy

By: blockbeats|2025/02/05 07:30:03
0
Share
copy

The Base protocol has rapidly emerged as a leader in the Ethereum L2 ecosystem during the cryptocurrency boom, thanks to its astonishing growth rate and innovative capabilities. Its success is not accidental but rather the result of the collective efforts of numerous developers, builders, and community members. Being the crypto media outlet in the Asia-Pacific region most focused on the Base ecosystem, BlockBeats has specially curated the "Base Builder Talk" column to gain better insights into the development path and future opportunities behind the Base ecosystem. The column invites Asia-based teams, developers, and community contributors deeply involved in and actively building the Base ecosystem to share their journeys and unique insights. Through this series of interviews, we hope to enable more people to understand the community resilience and boundless potential of Base.

Base Builder Talk: How a China-based Developer Endorsed by Base is Going All-In on the On-Chain Economy

Base Protocol Lead Jesse States Supporting Chinese Developers is the Top Priority for 2025

In the first edition, BlockBeats invited 183Aaros.base.eth, a researcher at Onchain who was recently retweeted by Jesse. From traditional economics to on-chain economics, he showcased a new paradigm of "production-consumption-reconsumption-reproduction" in the Onchain world with unique dialectical thinking and practical experience. In the conversation, Aaros mentioned his understanding of the "cyber reality," interdisciplinary thinking on on-chain economics, and enthusiasm for building the Base ecosystem. Through his narration, we may catch a glimpse of the significant role Base plays in shaping the on-chain economic structure and fostering new application forms.

Below is the full interview content, reorganized for readability:

BlockBeats: Please provide a brief background about yourself and why you embarked on the crypto journey.

Aaros: I studied Economics for my undergraduate degree in the UK, and my Master's was in investment banking. In 2018, I joined a hedge fund recommended by a law school assistant professor, where I was mainly responsible for screening crypto projects for them. It was also during that time that I truly entered the "rabbit hole" of cryptocurrency.

Image Source: Aaros Personal Website

While the traditional financial industry was relatively conservative towards the crypto industry at the time, I personally had high hopes for the future of cryptocurrency. Based on my reflections on currency and logical consistency, I bought a significant amount of Cardano tokens at the time. Later, after returning to my home country, I worked in traditional finance for a period, mainly in industry research and the IPO market. At the same time, I had been continuously investing in cryptocurrency, and after gaining my first bucket of gold in the 2021 crypto bull market, I resigned to go all in on Web3.

BlockBeats: So, let's talk about your crypto journey over the years. Why did you choose the Base ecosystem?

Aaros: My main project is Onchainomics. From 2018 to 2021, it was a phase where I conducted industry research, made investments, traded, and laid the foundation for an economic framework. Then, in 2022, after several partners joined me, incorporating philosophy, the economics of desire along with my previous traditional economic viewpoint and trading indicators, we established a consistent yet highly complex core predictive system.

Onchainomics is a subset under this framework, with many concepts and forecasts yet to be elaborated. I chose Base because I resonated with Jesse's slogan "build a global onchain economy." This statement aligns well with my vision and mission over the years; it's exactly what I've been looking for.

During Onchain Summer, Jesse also mentioned in the Buildathon that a builder could be not only a coder but also a creator and a community builder, all are welcome to participate. This broad perspective deeply attracted me. Although I can code a bit, my strength lies in economics and industry research. Developing a comprehensive project independently in Web 3 is quite challenging. After hearing Jesse talk about this narrative, I felt like I could also participate. I really liked its narrative. I want to engage more in this ecosystem and contribute my efforts. It's a very pure thought — I want to play with everyone, and if you allow me to join, I'm in.

BlockBeats: Over the past year, Aaros has had many award-winning papers. Could you first talk to us about the sources of inspiration for your usual writing and your work style?

Aaros: My sources of inspiration mainly come from the aforementioned core predictive system, integrating hot topics and theory dissemination. There is a contradiction in my work style: the core predictive system may not be directly understandable to most people as it spans various disciplines. However, what each reader can understand actually stems from these core predictive systems.

Aaros's Paragraph Homepage

What Is Onchain? Deconstructing On-chain Economics

BlockBeats: How do you understand Onchain? Does it bring the real world onto the chain?

Aaros: We have a rather special understanding, using dialectics to deconstruct and reconstruct the proposition of reality and virtuality. Traditionally, reality and virtuality are seen as opposites, but where is the breakthrough point? For example, take Meituan. Is it virtual or real? Here, it seems that this proposition is somewhat deconstructed, and no matter which way you think about it, it seems both right and wrong. This is where dialectics come into play.

We have coined a term called "cyber reality" — not the binary opposition of virtual or real, but a new kind of reality, a new paradigm. Narratives like encryption, Onchain, and Agents, in terms of their impact on consumption and production, are not binary oppositions.

If we are stuck in the narrative of the past, we cannot see the possibilities brought by the new narrative, so we need to use the definition of cyber reality to move it towards the so-called reality. In this proposition, there is no pure virtual because the virtual is also real. Therefore, Onchain is also a realization of cyber reality.

BlockBeats: After discussing Onchain, let's talk about On-chain Economics. On your website, you define it as an integration of blockchain economics, tokenomics, and traditional economics, making it an interdisciplinary field. Could you break down this concept?

Aaros: The concept is encompassed within cryptoeconomics. The starting point was this because at that time, we had not yet seen clearly the relationship between Onchain and Offchain, virtual, and real. So I tackled it in a somewhat classificatory or categorical way to define it, but in reality, I did not provide an ontological status; we just saw a gap between some disciplines, and we described this gap.

Traditional macroeconomics does not pay much attention to on-chain economic activities, and its follow-up is relatively slow. The MIT Cryptoeconomics Lab has contributed to some discourse, but it has not been fully promoted. On the other hand, on-chain, because Ethereum developers are more focused on cryptography, the entire industry has a trend of studying game theory as the main line of cryptoeconomics.

Pure game theory research, Tokenomics research, I personally think is relatively narrow. After the emergence of many on-chain activities such as the Base ecosystem, the entire market is generating more new economic activities, many of which have not been studied by scholars. Our initial starting point was just to discover this gap. Later, we found a quasi-ontological status for this gap, that it is truly something new, not just virtual, not just real, it is the "cyber reality."

BlockBeats: As an individual participating in the crypto economy, what are some common sense knowledge that we need to know?

Aaros: Do not persist in using modern industrialism and productionism like looking for a needle in a haystack. It is not the more you produce, the better. Productivity is one aspect, and production structure, production relations, consumption structure, income structure are another. Global production oversupply actually requires creating demand. Creating real demand or fake demand, as long as you can digest this contradiction, it will be a boost, and the economy will give you a certain status and return. I think it is more similar to Base's culture, focusing on the consumption end rather than the production end. Traditional economics focuses more on how to improve production efficiency, but the cycle we are currently in may be: without consumption demand, everything is impossible.

BlockBeats: What do you think consumption is? Participating in the on-chain economy, mint NFTs, or something else?

Aaros: Yes, participate, engage, and then ordinary individuals can consume more of these things.

BlockBeats: Just consuming, in simple terms, how can individuals make money on-chain?

Aaros: Money is currency. In the production-consumption paradigm, currency is an intermediary link. In fact, consumption is not just spending money. For example, Capital is not just money, it is also skills, it is also your cognition. So you have to construct it yourself, but to construct, you need handy tools. This building is not production; it is a structure that constructs a new narrative, new scenes, and a new life.

For example, let's take another example. Using an AI Agent is a form of consumption behavior. Of course, you can also see it as the other end, utilizing an AI Agent to produce an article is a form of production behavior. However, when you first learn to use it, you are a consumer participating in the cycle. Your first step is consumption (usage) to join this wave, and then you realize what you can produce on top of AI.

Onchain's "Production-Consumption" New Paradigm

BlockBeats: Jessie recently posted an update, saying that two AI agents helped him buy a pizza. Aaros, could you discuss how in this new paradigm, AI and humans collectively participate in the on-chain economic production-consumption process?

Aaros: I think Jessie has perfectly exemplified that paradigm. Through his consumption behavior, he explains why consumption is important, why the consumption scenario is important, and why creating consumption is important.

Our original paradigm refers to the production function, which is production, followed by consumption. In the past, we always thought of production and consumption as two ends, and the new approach is from p to c' and then to p' and back to p. In other words, after the traditional way, there will be a c', which I previously wrote in the Notes as "to create." Jesse's act of having two AI agents collaborate to order pizza is the essence of that c'. It is not just a consumption behavior but a kind of creation that builds a whole new paradigm, hence called "to create."

It may seem a bit complex to understand. p' is equivalent to after you create c', you would think about how to optimize various aspects of this c'. The first step is to get things done, meaning to buy the pizza. However, many small details are not perfect; it's just a demo. Still, by creating this consumption scenario, the subsequent p' is about completing and perfecting various aspects of this consumption scenario. However, this is not actually production; it is an improvement in production efficiency. It is not about solving the "buying pizza" problem in the P domain but addressing the "two AI agents" issue in the P' domain.

This is somewhat like building a mother machine. A mother machine is the machine in the mechanical industry that produces bearings, and the meaning of this 'p' is a machine's machine. If you want to create the next generation of a cyberspace economy or a crypto economy, you must first build the mother machine. For example, Base's OnchainKit is a kind of mother machine-building behavior, including Ethereum constantly emphasizing infrastructure, which is also a way of a mother machine—first, someone imagined or demonstrated a new narrative and a new consumption scenario, and then proceeded to mass-produce mother machines that can support consumption.

BlockBeats: Speaking of building a machine's machine, is the Base Builder House plan you sent me also considered a kind of action to build this machine?

Aaros: Yeah, 706Creators initiator Shirlene came to me. She had previously done a hacker house at Solana and Sui, and this time came to me wanting to do a builder house in Shanghai and Shenzhen, collectively exerting efforts to develop the Base ecosystem in the Chinese community. So, we are planning to hold a building creating and living event in February.

BlockBeats: What will be the final output form then?

Aaros: The ultimate output direction is that 10 projects can go Onchain, some Demo onboarding Onchain. Through this build house, the Chinese community partners in Base will have a closer connection and be able to help each other, just like the English-speaking Base builder community.

Base Builder House Sign-up Link

BlockBeats: There is a viewpoint that believes American entrepreneurs have no idea how to develop applications, and Onchain is simply reinventing the wheel. What's the point of moving Dianping or Didi to the chain? How do you see this?

Aaros: We can link back to the paradigm I just mentioned, this is not a repeat of the mass production. For example, Jesse's behavior, he is in c', his focus is not on how well p is done, not the question of how to get the pizza faster, but on creating a new c', another thing is what Musk advocates to do is also from c' to p', "to create", "to produce".

BlockBeats: It means not to consider from a biased practical perspective, but to focus on innovation.

Aaros: Yes, narrative or cognitive innovation, and then the next step is that we start again as if there was no Meituan before, and we recreate a Meituan, such a process. I think the so-called "everything on the chain" narrative in 2017 was at the first p, but now the Onchain is at the position of c'/p', which is a different place, more about the different monetary mindset, where money as an important intermediary in the equation causes demand to change.

BlockBeats: So how are these demands generated? Or are the current demands sufficient to generate those applications?

Aaros: c' can be intuitively felt in one sentence, which is "We choose to go to the Moon", the person who made that choice is doing c'. It's not about how well the spaceship to the moon was built, but about "We choose to go to the Moon", this decision, this belief.

Ethereum Needs to Focus on the "Greater Ecosystem"

BlockBeats: These days the Ethereum Foundation has been caught in a public opinion storm, we can talk about the entire Ethereum ecosystem. As someone deeply involved in both the OP and Base ecosystems, what are the differences between these two ecosystems at the moment? And what stage is the L2 War currently in? Is there any sign of a winner-takes-all situation, or is it in a stage where the outcome is still uncertain?

Aaros: I have been following this recent issue. I agree with Vitalik's attitude of focusing on the core Top Developer, and on the other hand, the community demands more transparency, openness, marketing, and so on, which I think is also reasonable.

The relationship between OP and Base has always been very close, as Base is one of the initiators of the OP Superchain, and now many Base experts also serve as advisors to various OP committees. Base is currently the most expensive L2 in terms of on-chain settlement fees, and in this regard, I don't think there should be a winner-takes-all concept. Base is also quite open to Solana and other excellent ecosystems, not in a closed-door state, and very much welcomes collaboration among ecosystems.

On the other hand, the relationship between OP+Base and Ethereum may need to be closer. Ethereum's support for L2s has seen changes this year, such as interoperability between L2s. The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has also initiated some activities to support this, and there are some EIPs supporting improvements in this area.

BlockBeats: Vitalik has just released an article, and the most widely spread viewpoint in it is that he has begun to talk about consolidating Ethereum as the main asset of a larger Ethereum economic system, encouraging L2s to support Ethereum, and then returning a portion of the fees to L1, such as through burning permanent staking or donating rewards. Can we understand this as Vitalik feeling a bit urgent, facing internal and external challenges?

Aaros: Over the past few years, we have seen the entire Ethereum ecosystem place a strong emphasis on topics such as Tokenomics and MEV minimization after the 2.0 upgrade. However, at a larger ecosystem level and between different L2s, there are few discussions on cross-ecosystem macro and microeconomic issues. For example, the topic of information asymmetry, which is obvious in microeconomics, could have been foreseen in the era of ETH 2.0 but had to wait until conflicts erupted before being addressed. This is an area where improvements can be made.

BlockBeats: Can we blame the Ethereum Foundation for inaction?

Aaros: I think this is a blind spot that is easy to fall into in a decentralized environment, where everyone focuses on what they are good at, and areas where they are not proficient are overlooked and left unattended. However, this is normal. Of course, I am not optimistic that researchers will shift from a microeconomic and technologically deterministic view to a more holistic or reconstructive perspective to focus on macro issues.

BlockBeats: Why is that?

Aaros: The so-called mass adoption requires bridging to the traditional economy, onboarding, but so far I have only seen some slogans or marketing stuff, without any related research or organization focusing on this advancement. To be honest, there are quite a few people in the ecosystem who don't think my work is research. They might think that you haven't researched topics like MEV minimal extraction, haven't focused on technical details or those seemingly very technical issues, that's what they consider research, not this narrative or model perspective that I take.

BlockBeats: Do you think you need to clear your name?

Aaros: We are a kind of essentialist research, just seeing that I said it, whether there is an audience, whether readers can understand, there is actually no specific connection to our theory for now.

BlockBeats: In 2024, the trend rotates quickly. In 2023, I think it's okay. Friendtech can get hype for half a year. Starting from Blast, every trend lasting two months is already considered long. In this rhythm, how do you maintain your own pace, find your principles, and build your framework?

Aaros: This might be the talent of an INTP hahaha, a kind of thinking mode with primary introverted logic, insisting on a complete logical system. The suggestion may be to try to focus on some laws that remain effective after a paradigm shift.

BlockBeats: Recommend three researchers you admire the most.

Aaros: Professor Paul Dylan-Ennis from University College Dublin Business School. Then there are Teacher Luo (0xLuo) and Teacher Pingfeng. They have a keen sense of smell, act purely, and can give me some very good dehydrated perceptions.

BlockBeats: How do you define yourself then?

Aaros: My own perception is an Engine Starter.

BlockBeats: What kind of engine?

Aaros: The Engine of History. I have a pinned post on Farcaster where I talk about going to the very edge of history, and that's basically what this is—self-positioning.

You may also like

a16z Leads $18M Seed Round for Catena Labs, Crypto Industry Bets on Stablecoin AI Payment

Traditional finance is still stuck in a "human-to-human" model, while Catena aims to achieve "AI-to-AI" interaction.

Pharos, deeply integrated with AntChain, is about to launch. How can we get involved?

What is the relationship between the $8 million funded NewChain and Ant, and how will they interact?

$COIN Joins S&P 500, but Coinbase Isn't Celebrating

On May 13, S&P Dow Jones Indices announced that Coinbase would officially replace Discover Financial Services in the S&P 500 on May 19. While other companies like Block and MicroStrategy, closely tied to Bitcoin, were already part of the S&P 500, Coinbase became the first cryptocurrency exchange whose primary business is in the index. This also signifies that cryptocurrency is gradually moving from the fringes to the mainstream in the U.S.



On the day of the announcement, Coinbase's stock price surged by 23%, surpassing the $250 mark. However, just 3 days later, Coinbase was hit by two consecutive events: a hack where employees were bribed to steal customer data and a demand for a $20 million ransom, and an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into the authenticity of its claim of having over 100 million "verified users" in its securities filings and marketing materials. These two events acted as mini-bombs, and at the time of writing, Coinbase's stock had already dropped by over 7.3%.


Coincidentally, Discover Financial Services, being replaced by Coinbase, can also be considered the "Coinbase" of the previous payment era. Discover is a U.S.-based digital banking and payment services company headquartered in Illinois, founded in 1960. Its payment network, Discover Network, is the fourth largest payment network apart from Visa, Mastercard, and American Express.


In April, after the approval of the acquisition of Discover by the sixth-largest U.S. bank, Capital One, this well-established digital banking company of over 60 years smoothly handed over its S&P 500 "seat" to this emerging cryptocurrency "bank." This unexpected coincidence also portrayed the handover between the new and old eras in Coinbase's entry into the S&P 500, resembling a relay race scene. However, this relay baton also brought Coinbase's accumulated "external troubles and internal strife" to a tipping point.


Side Effects of ETFs


Over the past decade, cryptocurrency exchanges have been the most stable "profit machines." They play a role in providing liquidity to the entire industry and rely on trading fees to sustain their operations. However, with the comprehensive rollout of ETF products in the U.S. market, this profit model is facing unprecedented challenges. As the leader in the "American stack," with over 80% of its business coming from the U.S., Coinbase is most affected by this.



Starting from the approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, traditional financial capital has significantly onboarded users and funds that originally belonged to exchanges in a more cost-effective, compliant, and transparent manner. The transaction fee revenue of cryptocurrency exchanges has started to decline, and this trend may further intensify in the coming months.


According to Coinbase's 2024 Q4 financial report, the platform's total trading revenue was $417 million, a 45% year-on-year decrease. The contribution of BTC and ETH's trading revenue dropped from 65% in the same period last year to less than 50%.


This decline is not a result of a decrease in market enthusiasm. In fact, since the approval of the Bitcoin ETF in January 2024, the inflow of BTC into the U.S. market has continued to reach new highs, with asset management giants like BlackRock and Fidelity rapidly expanding their management scale. Data shows that BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) alone has surpassed $17 billion in assets under management. As of mid-May 2025, the cumulative net inflow of 11 major institutional Bitcoin spot ETFs on the market has exceeded $41.5 billion, with a total net asset value of $1214.69 billion, accounting for approximately 5.91% of the total Bitcoin market capitalization.


Chart showing the trend of net outflows for Grayscale among the 11 institutions


Institutional investors and some retail investors are shifting towards ETF products, partly due to compliance and tax considerations. On one hand, ETFs have much lower trading costs compared to cryptocurrency exchanges. While Coinbase's spot trading fee rate varies annually in a tiered manner but averages around 1.49%, for example, the management fee for IBIT ETF is only 0.25%, and the majority of ETF institution fees fluctuate around 0.15% to 0.25%.



In other words, the more rational users are, the more likely they are to move from exchanges to ETF products, especially for investors aiming for long-term holdings.


According to multiple sources, several institutions, including VanEck and Grayscale, have submitted applications to the SEC for a Solana (SOL) ETF, with some institutions also planning to submit an XRP ETF proposal. Once approved, this may trigger a new round of fund migration. According to a report submitted by Coinbase to the SEC, as of April, the platform's trading revenue from XRP and Solana accounted for 18% and 10%, nearly one-third of the platform's fee revenue.



However, the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs passed in 2024 also reduced the fees for these two tokens on Coinbase from 30% and 15% to 26% and 10%, respectively. If the SOL and XRP ETFs are approved, it will further undermine the core fee revenue of exchanges like Coinbase.


The expansion of ETF products is gradually weakening the financial intermediary status of cryptocurrency exchanges. From their original roles as matchmakers and clearers to now gradually becoming mere "on-ramps and off-ramps" for funds, exchanges are seeing their marginal value squeezed by ETFs.


Robinhood Takes a Stand, Traditional Brokerages Join the Fray


On May 12, 2025, SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins gave a keynote speech at the Tokenization and Cryptocurrency Working Group roundtable. The theme of his speech revolved around "It is a new day at the SEC," where he indicated that the SEC would not approach enforcement and regulation the same way as before but would instead pave the way for cryptocurrency assets in the U.S. market.



With signs of cryptocurrency compliance such as the SEC's "NEW DAY" declaration, an increasing number of traditional brokerages are attempting to enter the cryptocurrency industry. One of the most representative cases is the well-known U.S. brokerage Robinhood, which began expanding its crypto business in 2018. By the time of its IPO in 2021, Robinhood's crypto business revenue accounted for over 50% of the company, with a significant boost from the Dogecoin "moonshot" promoted by Musk.


In Q1 2025 earnings report, Robinhood showcased strong growth, especially in revenue from cryptocurrency and options trading. Fueled by Trump's Memecoin, cryptocurrency-related revenue reached $250 million, nearly doubling year-over-year. Consequently, Robinhood Gold subscription users reached 3.5 million, a 90% increase from the previous year, with the rapid growth of Robinhood Gold providing the company with a stable source of income.



Meanwhile, RobinHood is actively pursuing acquisitions in the cryptocurrency space. In 2024, it announced a $2 billion acquisition of the long-standing European cryptocurrency exchange Bitstamp. Additionally, Canada's largest cryptocurrency CEX, WonderFi, which recently went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange, also announced its integration with RobinHood Crypto. After obtaining virtual asset licenses in the UK, Canada, Singapore, and other markets, RobinHood has taken a proactive approach in the compliant cryptocurrency trading market.



Furthermore, an increasing number of brokerage firms are exploring the same path. Futu Securities, Tiger Brokers, and others are also dipping their toes into cryptocurrency trading, with some having applied for or obtained the VA license from the Hong Kong SFC. Although their user bases are currently small, traditional brokerages have a natural advantage in user trust, regulatory licenses, and low fee structures. This could pose a threat to native cryptocurrency platforms in the future.



User Data Breach: Is Coinbase Still Secure?


In April 2025, security researchers discovered that some Coinbase user data was leaked on the dark web. While the platform initially responded by attributing it to a "technical misinformation," it still raised concerns among users regarding its security and privacy protection. Just two days before Dow Jones Indexes announced Coinbase's addition to the S&P 500 Index, on May 11, 2025, Coinbase received an email from an unknown threat actor claiming to have obtained customer account information and internal documents, demanding a $20 million ransom to keep the data private. Subsequent investigations confirmed the data breach.


Cybercriminals obtained the data by bribing overseas customer service agents and support staff, mainly in "non-U.S. regions such as India." These agents abused their access to Coinbase's internal customer support system and stole customer data. As early as February this year, blockchain detective ZachXBT revealed on X platform that between December 2024 and January 2025, Coinbase users lost over $65 million to social engineering scams, with the actual amount potentially higher.


Among the victims was a well-known figure, 67-year-old Ed Suman, an established artist in the art world for nearly two decades, having been involved in the creation of artworks such as Jeff Koons' "Balloon Dog" sculpture. Earlier this year, he fell victim to an impersonation scam involving fake Coinbase customer support, resulting in a loss of over $2 million in cryptocurrency. ZachXBT critiqued Coinbase for its inadequate handling of such scams, noting that other major exchanges have not faced similar issues and recommending Coinbase to enhance its security measures.


Amidst a series of ongoing social engineering incidents, although there has not been any impact on user assets at the technical level so far, it has raised concerns among many retail and institutional investors. Especially institutions holding massive assets on Coinbase. Just considering the U.S. BTC ETF institutions, as of mid-May 2025, they collectively hold nearly 840,000 BTC, and 75% of these are custodied by Coinbase. If we price BTC at $100,000, this amount reaches a staggering $63 billion, which is equivalent to the nominal GDP of two Iceland in the year 2024.


Visualization: ChatGPT, Source: Farside


In addition, Coinbase Custody also serves over 300 institutional clients, including hedge funds, family offices, pension funds, and endowments. As of the Q1 2025 financial report, Coinbase's total assets under management (including institutional and retail clients) reached $404 billion. The specific amount of institutional custodied assets was not explicitly disclosed in the latest report, but it should still be over 50% based on the Q4 2024 report.


Visualization: ChatGPT


Once this security barrier is breached, not only could the rate of user attrition far exceed expectations, but more importantly, institutional trust in it would undermine the foundation of its business. Therefore, after a hacking event, Coinbase's stock price plummeted significantly.


CEXs are All in Self-Rescue Mode


Facing a decline in spot trading fee revenue, Coinbase is also accelerating its transformation, attempting to find growth opportunities in derivatives and emerging assets. Coinbase acquired a stake in the options platform Deribit at the end of 2024 and announced the official launch of perpetual contract products in 2025. This acquisition fills in Coinbase's gap in options trading and its relatively small global market share.



Deribit has a strong presence in non-U.S. markets, especially in Asia and Europe. The acquisition has enabled Coinbase to gain a dominant position in bitcoin and ethereum options trading on Deribit, accounting for approximately 80% of the global options trading volume, with daily trading volume remaining above $2 billion.


Meanwhile, 80-90% of Deribit's customer base consists of institutional investors, with their professionalism and liquidity in the Bitcoin and Ethereum options market highly favored by institutions. Coinbase's compliance advantage, coupled with its already robust institutional ecosystem, makes it even more suitable. By using institutions as an entry point, it can face the squeeze from giants like Binance and OKX in the derivatives market.



Facing a similar dilemma is Kraken, which is attempting to replicate Binance Futures' model in non-U.S. markets. Since the derivatives market relies more on professional users, fee rates are relatively higher and stickiness is stronger, making it a significant source of revenue for exchanges. In the first half of 2025, Kraken completed the acquisition of TradeStation Crypto and a futures exchange, aiming to build a complete derivatives trading ecosystem to hedge the risk of declining spot transaction fee income.


With the surge of Memecoin in 2024, Binance, OKX, and various CEX platforms began massively listing small-market-cap, highly volatile tokens to activate active trading users. Due to the wealth effect and trading activity of Memecoins, Coinbase was also forced to join the battle, successively listing popular tokens from the Solana ecosystem such as BOOK OF MEME and Dogwifhat. Although these coins are controversial, they are frequently traded, with fee rates several times higher than mainstream coins, serving as a "blood-boosting" method for spot trading.


However, due to its status as a publicly traded company, this practice is a riskier endeavor for Coinbase. Even in the current crypto-friendly environment, the SEC is still investigating whether tokens like SOL, ADA, and SAND constitute securities.


In addition to the forced transformation strategies carried out by the aforementioned CEXs, they are also starting to lay out RWAs and the most talked-about stablecoin payment fields, such as the PYUSD launched through a collaboration between Coinbase and Paypal, Coinbase's support for the Euro stablecoin EURC by Circle that complies with EU MiCA regulatory requirements, or the USD1 launched through a collaboration between Binance and WIFL. In the increasingly crowded trading field, many CEXs have shifted their focus from just the trading market to the application field.


The golden age of transaction fees has quietly ended, and the second half of the crypto exchange platform game has silently begun.


Arthur Hayes: Why I'm Betting on ETH While the Market Is Obsessed with SOL

"I personally have also allocated 20% to gold, expecting the price of gold to potentially rise to $10,000-20,000 by the end of this market cycle."

CryptoPunks Changes Hands Twice, Did the Originator of NFTs Finally Find Its "Forever Home" This Time?

The original NFT pioneer CryptoPunks has once again officially changed ownership after being sold to the Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) developer Yuga Labs.

The End and Rebirth of NFTs: How the Meme Coin Craze Ended the PFP Era?

There must be another Labubu hidden beneath the ruins.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more