Is Leveraged Bitcoin DCA More Profitable than Spot?

By: blockbeats|2026/01/15 06:00:01
0
Share
copy
Original Title: "Is DCA Leveraged in BTC Really More Profitable?"
Original Author: CryptoPunk

Five-Year Backtest Tells You: 3x Leverage Has Almost No Cost-Effectiveness

Conclusion Upfront:

In a backtest over the past five years, the final return of BTC's three times leveraged DCA was only 3.5% higher than two times leverage, but it incurred a risk cost close to zero.

From the perspective of risk, return, and feasibility — spot DCA is actually the optimal long-term solution; 2x is the limit; 3x is not worthwhile.

Part One|Five-Year DCA Net Worth Curve: 3x Did Not "Pull Ahead"

Is Leveraged Bitcoin DCA More Profitable than Spot?

The net worth trend can be easily seen:

· Spot (1x): A smooth upwards curve with manageable drawdowns

· 2x Leverage: Significantly amplifies returns during a bull market

· 3x Leverage: Experiences multiple "ground-level crawls," being consumed by long-term oscillations

Although in the rebound of 2025-2026, 3x slightly outperformed 2x in the end,

but over several years, the net worth of 3x consistently lagged behind 2x.

Note: In this backtest, the leverage part was backtested using daily rebalancing, resulting in volatility drag.

This means:

The final victory of 3x heavily depends on the "last segment of the market."

Part Two|Final Return Comparison: Leverage's Marginal Returns Quickly Diminish


The key is not "who benefits the most," but by how much extra:

· 1x → 2x: Extra earnings ≈ $23,700

· 2x → 3x: Only extra earnings ≈ $2,300

Earnings almost no longer increase, but the risk increases exponentially.

Three | Maximum Drawdown: 3x is close to "structural failure"

There is a very crucial reality here:

· -50%: Psychologically tolerable

· -86%: Requires +614% to break even

· -96%: Requires +2400% to break even

With 3x leverage in the 2022 bear market, it has essentially reached "mathematical bankruptcy,"

Subsequent profits come almost entirely from new capital inflows after the bear market bottom.

Four | Risk-Adjusted Return: Spot Trading is Optimal

This set of data illustrates three things:

1. Spot trading offers the highest risk-adjusted return

2. The higher the leverage, the worse the downside risk "risk-to-reward ratio"

3. 3x remains in a deep drawdown area for an extended period, causing tremendous psychological pressure

Ulcer Index = 0.51, what does this mean?

Your account is "underwater" for a long time, providing almost no positive feedback.

Why does 3x leverage perform so poorly in the long term?

The reason in just one sentence:


“Daily Rebalancing + High Volatility = Continuous Decay”

In a ranging market:

· Upward Movement → Increase Position

· Downward Movement → Decrease Position

· No Clear Trend → Account Keeps Shrinking

This is the typical Volatility Drag.

And its destructive power is directly proportional to the square of the leverage ratio.

For high-volatility assets like BTC,

3x leverage results in a 9x volatility penalty.

Final Conclusion: BTC Itself is Already a “High-Risk Asset”

The answer from this five-year backtest is very clear:

· Spot Investment: Optimal risk-return ratio, suitable for long-term execution

· 2x Leverage: Aggressive upper limit, only suitable for a few individuals

· 3x Leverage: Very low long-term cost-effectiveness, not suitable as an investment tool

If you believe in the long-term value of BTC,

then the most rational choice is often not to “add another layer of leverage,”

but to let time be on your side, not against you.

Original Article Link

You may also like

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more